Publisher Information: Linköpings universitet, Avdelningen för inflammation och infektion Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten Region Östergötland, Klinisk patologi Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, England; Univ Birmingham, England Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, England; Univ Birmingham, England Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, England; Univ Birmingham, England Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, England; Univ Birmingham, England UCL, England South Tyneside & Sunderland NHS Fdn Trust, England Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, England Univ Leicester, England Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, England Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, England; Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, England UCL, England; PATH, WA USA; Wellcome Trust Res Labs, England Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, England Univ London, England Univ Birmingham, England Independent Canc Patients Voice, England Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, England; Univ Leeds, England Hosp Sick Children, Canada; SickKids Res Inst, Canada Genom England Ltd, England; Alan Turing Inst, England Emory Univ, GA USA Emory Univ, GA USA Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, England; Univ Birmingham, England; UCL, England Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, England; Univ Birmingham, England ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC 2025
نبذة مختصرة : Purpose: There are many radiological datasets for breast cancer, some which have supported the development of AI medical devices for breast cancer screening and image classification. This review aims to identify mammography datasets (including digitised screen film mammography, 2D digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis) used in the development of AI technologies and present their characteristics, including their transparency of documentation, content, populations included and accessibility. Materials and methods: MEDLINE and Google Dataset searches identified studies describing AI technology development and referencing breast imaging datasets up to June 2024. The characteristics of each dataset are summarised. In particular, the accompanying documentation was reviewed with a focus on diversity and inclusion of populations represented within each dataset. Results: 254 datasets were referenced in the literature search, 190 were privately held, 36 had barriers which prevented access, and 28 were accessible. Most datasets originated from Europe, East Asia and North America. There was poor reporting of individuals' attributes: 32 (12 %) datasets reported race or ethnicity; 76 (30 %) reported female/male categories with only one dataset explicitly defining whether these categories represented sex or gender attributes. Conclusion: Through this review, we demonstrate gaps in the data landscape for mammography, highlighting poor representation globally. To ensure datasets in breast imaging have maximum utility for researchers, their characteristics should be documented and limitations of datasets, such as their representativeness of populations and settings, should inform scientific efforts to translate data-driven insights into technologies and discoveries.
Processing Request
No Comments.