Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Global Radiomic Features from Mammography for Predicting Difficult-To-Interpret Normal Cases.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Publisher Information:
      SPRINGER 2023-08
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      This work aimed to investigate whether global radiomic features (GRFs) from mammograms can predict difficult-to-interpret normal cases (NCs). Assessments from 537 readers interpreting 239 normal mammograms were used to categorise cases as 120 difficult-to-interpret and 119 easy-to-interpret based on cases having the highest and lowest difficulty scores, respectively. Using lattice- and squared-based approaches, 34 handcrafted GRFs per image were extracted and normalised. Three classifiers were constructed: (i) CC and (ii) MLO using the GRFs from corresponding craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique images only, based on the random forest technique for distinguishing difficult- from easy-to-interpret NCs, and (iii) CC + MLO using the median predictive scores from both CC and MLO models. Useful GRFs for the CC and MLO models were recognised using a scree test. The CC and MLO models were trained and validated using the leave-one-out-cross-validation. The models' performances were assessed by the AUC and compared using the DeLong test. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine if the 34 GRFs differed between difficult- and easy-to-interpret NCs and if difficulty level based on the traditional breast density (BD) categories differed among 115 low-BD and 124 high-BD NCs. The CC + MLO model achieved higher performance (0.71 AUC) than the individual CC and MLO model alone (0.66 each), but statistically non-significant difference was found (all p > 0.05). Six GRFs were identified to be valuable in describing difficult-to-interpret NCs. Twenty features, when compared between difficult- and easy-to-interpret NCs, differed significantly (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in difficulty between low- and high-BD NCs (p = 0.709). GRF mammographic analysis can predict difficult-to-interpret NCs.
    • الموضوع:
    • Availability:
      Open access content. Open access content
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • Other Numbers:
      LT1 oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/173972
      J Digit Imaging, 2023, 36, (4), pp. 1541-1552
      0897-1889
      1618-727X
      1426989279
    • Contributing Source:
      UNIV OF TECH, SYDNEY
      From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative.
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsoai.on1426989279
HoldingsOnline