Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×

Processing Request
Buddhism: Between Paradox and Practice-Morally Relevant Distinctions in the Buddhist Characterization of Animals
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×

Processing Request
- معلومة اضافية
- Publisher Information:
Routledge 2019
- نبذة مختصرة :
Buddhist cosmology proposes a hierarchical taxonomy of sentient beings cycling endlessly through samsaric realms propelled by their karma. Within this hierarchy, the status and capacities of animals are characterised as subordinate to those of human beings; rebirth as an animal is considered unfortunate while rebirth as a human is considered particularly fortunate. The Buddhist hierarchy of sentient beings is thus superficially similar to Aristotle’s scala naturae in which animals also occupy a lowly position. A lasting consequence of Aristotle’s scala naturae and reflected in The Politics, is the belief that all natural things are located in a graduated scale and oriented toward some end, with animals being intended for the use of humans (Newmeyer, 2011). For Aristotle, animals’ lack of rational capacity was a sufficient morally relevant distinction justifying the possibility of exploitation (Engle and Jenni, 2010). This morally relevant distinction was later incorporated into Christian theology through Thomas Aquinas whose Summa Theologica reflects and modifies Aristotle’s scala naturae with the result that, once again, animals were subordinated to the desires and needs of humans (McInerney, 1998). This presentation argues that while Buddhism also subordinates the capacities of animals to those of humans, it does not find a morally relevant distinction within this framework justifying the ordering of animals to human ends. This apparent paradox of subordination-without-exploitation is explained by the very different way Buddhist philosophy characterises animals. The Buddhist characterisation of animals is reflected in practices intended to benefit animals while acknowledging the significant differences between human and animal capacities.
- الموضوع:
- Availability:
Open access content. Open access content
© 2019 Routledge (Taylor and Francis)
- Note:
en_AU
- Other Numbers:
AUANP oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/202744
9781138592728
1291845613
- Contributing Source:
AUSTRALIAN NAT UNIV - PRINT REPOSITORY
From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative.
- الرقم المعرف:
edsoai.on1291845613
HoldingsOnline
No Comments.