Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Augmentative and alternative communication intervention in traumatic brain injury ; La intervención de la comunicación aumentativa y alternativa en el traumatismo craneoencefálico

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
اقرأ أكثر حفظ في قائمتي
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      Ediciones Complutense
    • الموضوع:
      2018
    • Collection:
      Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM): Revistas Científicas Complutenses
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors may experience significant communication disorders that depend on factors such as the extent and the severity of the injury, and the level of cognitive functioning. Communication disorders restrict participation in conversation and daily functional tasks and limit the reintegration to familiar, social and working environments. Communication needs that stem from these impairments are usually unmet. Hence, the Augmentative and Alternative Communication intervention is an option for consideration along recovery process to compensate for temporal or permanent communicative needs and in an attempt to maximize communication function for social interaction. The aim of this paper is to describe the variety of AAC tools and strategies for a successful AAC assessment and intervention for TBI survivors. We follow the organizational framework of interventions strategies proposed by Fager et al. (Fager, 2005; Fager & Beukelman, 2005; Fager & Karantounis, 2010; Fager, Doyle, & Karantounis, 2007) that include the Stimulation Level, Structured Level and Compensation Level, rather than the traditional phases of recovery model. This study aims to contribute to Speech and Language Therapy intervention insofar as there are no materials written in Spanish that describe and summarize the variety of AAC assessment and intervention strategies in the traumatic brain-damaged population. ; Las personas que sobreviven a un traumatismo craneoencefálico (TCE) pueden presentar trastornos significativos de la comunicación que dependen del tamaño y severidad de la lesión y del nivel resultante de funcionamiento cognitivo. Los trastornos comunicativos generan una restricción en la participación en las actividades diarias y en la reintegración familiar, social y laboral. Ante las necesidades comunicativas insatisfechas derivadas de estos trastornos, el uso de la Comunicación Aumentativa y Alternativa (CAA) es una opción a considerar a lo largo del proceso de recuperación para compensar las ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RLOG/article/view/59529/4564456546782; American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to alternative communication. Position state¬ment. Resource document. http://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Aug¬mentative-and-Alternative-Communication. Accessed 15 julio 2017; Baker, B. (1986). Using images to generate speech. Byte, 11, 160-168.; Beukelman, D. R. y Ball, L. J. (2002).Improving AAC Use for Persons with Acquired Neu¬rogenic Disorders: Understanding Human and Engineering Factors. Assistive Technology, 14 (1), 33-44. doi:10.1080/10400435.2002.10132053; Beukelman, D., y Yorkston, K. (1977). A communication system for the severely dysarthric speaker with an intact language system. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 265-270.; Beukelman, D., y Mirenda, P. (1992). Augmentative and alternative communication process¬es. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.; Beukelman, D. R., y Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative Communication: Sup¬porting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.; Beukelman, D. R., Fager, S., Ball, L., y Dietz, A. (2007) AAC for adults with acquired neu¬rological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23 (3), 230-242. doi:10.1080/07434610701553668; Beukelman, D. R., Yorkston, K. M., y Dowden (1985). Communication augmentation: A casebook of clinical management. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.; Beukelman, D. R., Yorkston, K. M., y Garrett, K. L. (2007). An introduction to AAC services for adults with chronic medical conditions. Who, what, when, where and why. En D.R. Beukelman, K. L. Garrett, & K. M. Yorkston (Eds.), Augmentative Communication Strat¬egies for Adults with Acute or Chronic Medical Conditions (pp. 1-15). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.; Brooks, D. N. (1990). Cognitive deficits. En M. Rosenthal, E. R. Griffith, M. R. Bond, y J. D. Miller (Eds.), Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury (pp.163- 178). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.; Brown, J. A., Hux, K., Kenny, C. y Funk, T. (2015). Consistency and idiosyncrasy of seman¬tic categorization by individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Disability and Rehabilita¬tion: Assistive Technology, 10 (5), 378-384. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.921250; Brunner, M., Hemsley, B., Togher, L., y Palmer, S. (2017). Technology and its role in reha¬bilitation for people with cognitive-communication disability following a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain Injury, 31 (8), 1028-1043. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1292429; Burke, R., Beukelman, D. R., y Hux, K. (2004). Accuracy, efficiency and preferences of survivors of traumatic brain injury when using three organization strategies to retrieve words. Brain Injury, 18, 497-507. doi:10.1080/02699050310001645784; Burke, R., Wassink, K., Martin, T., y Seikel, A. J. (2008). Message retrieval for survivors of traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24 (1), 56-63. doi:10.1080/07434610701421015; Campbell, L., Balandin, S., y Togher, L. (2002). Augmentative and alternative communica¬tion use by people with traumatic brain injury: A review. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 24, 89 – 94. doi:10.1080/14417040210001669311; Coronas, M., y Basil, C. (2013). Comunicación aumentativa y alternativa para personas con afasia. Revista de Logopedia, Fonología y Audiología, 33, 126-135. doi:10.1016/j. rlfa.2012.10.004; Demasco, P. (1994). Human factors considerations in the design of language interfaces in AAC. Assistive Technology, 6, 10-25.; De Noreña D, Ríos-Lago M, Bombín-González I, Sánchez- Cubillo I, García-Molina A, y Tirapu-Ustárroz J. (2010). Efectividad de la rehabilitación neuropsicológica en el daño cerebral adquirido (I): atención, velocidad de procesamiento, memoria y lenguaje. Re¬vista de Neurología, 51, 687-98. Recuperado de https://www.psyciencia.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/efectividad-de-la-rehabilitaci%C3%83%C2%B3n-neuropsi¬col%C3%83%C2%B3gica.pdf; DeRuyter, F., y Donoghue, K. (1989). Communication and traumatic brain injury. A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 49-54. doi:10.1080/074346189 12331274966; DeRuyter, F., y Kennedy, M. (1991). Augmentative communication following traumatic brain injury. En D. Beukelman y K. Yorkston (Eds.), Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury: Management of cognitive, language, and motor impairments (pp. 317 – 365). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.; DeRuyter, F., y Lafontaine, L. (1987). The nonspeaking brain injured: A clinical and demo¬graphic database report. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 18-25. doi:10 .1080/07434618712331274209; Dietz, A., McKelvey, M., y Beukelman, D. (2006). Visual scene display: New AAC interface for persons with aphasia. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15 (1), 13-17. doi:10.1044/aac15.1.13; Dongilli, P. A., Hakel, M. E., y Beukelman, D. R. (1992). Recovery of functional speech following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 7, 91 – 101.; Doyle, M., y Fager, S. (2011). Traumatic Brain Injury and AAC: Supporting Communication Through Recovery. The ASHA Leader, 16. doi:10.1044/leader.FTR8.16022011.np; Doyle, M., Kennedy, M., Jausalaitis, G., y Phillips, B. (2000). AAC and traumatic brain injury. En D. R. Beukelman, K. M. Yorkston, y J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and al¬ternative communication for adults with acquire neurological disorders (pp. 271–304). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.; Fager, S. (2005). Individuals with traumatic brain injury. En D.R. Beukelman y P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs, 3rd edition (pp. 517--531). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.; Fager, S., y Beukelman, D. R. (2005). Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury. En D.R.Beu¬kelman y P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children & Adults with Complex Communication Needs (pp. 517-531). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.; Fager, S., y Karantounis, R. (2010). AAC assessment and intervention. En K. Hux (Ed.), Assisting survivors of traumatic brain injury: The Role of Speech-Language Pathologists (2nd ed) (pp. 227-254). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.; Fager, S. K., Doyle, M., y Karantounis, R. (2007). Traumatic brain injury. En D.R. Beukel¬man, K. L. Garrett, y K. M. Yorkston (Eds.), Augmentative Communication Strategies for Adults with Acute or Chronic Medical Conditions (pp. 131-162). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.; Fager, S., Hux, K., Beukelman, D. R., y Karantounis, R. (2006). Augmentative and Alterna¬tive Communication use and acceptance by adults with Traumatic Brain Injury. Augmen¬tative and Alternative Communication, 22 (1), 37-47. doi:10.1080/07434610500243990; Fried-Oken, M., y Doyle, M. (1992). Language representation for the augmentative and al¬ternative communication of adults with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 7(3), 59 – 69.; Fried-Oken, M., Beukelman, D. R., y Hux, K. (2012). Current and Future AAC Research Considerations for Adults with Acquired Cognitive and Communication Impairments. Assistive Technology, 24 (1), 56-66. doi:10.1080/10400435.2011.648713; Garrett, K., Fager, S. y Karantounis, R. H. (2010). Communication interventions for individ uals with severe-profound brain injuries. Seminar at ASHA, PA: Philadelphia.; Hagen, C. (1984). Language disorders in head trauma. En A. Holland (Ed.), Language disor¬ders in adults (pp. 257–258). Austin, Tx: PRO-ED.; Hagen, C. (2000). Rancho-Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning-Revised. Presented at TBI Rehabilitation Managed Care Environment: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Re¬habilitation by Continuing Education Programs of America, San Antonio, TX.; Hagen, C., Malkmus, D., y Durham, P. (1972). Levels of cognitive functioning. Downey (CA): Rancho Los Amigos Hospital.; Hagen, C. , Malkmus, D., & Durham, P. (1979). Levels of cognitive functioning. En Reha¬bilitation of the head-injured adult: Comprehensive physical management (pp. 87-89). Downey, CA: Professional Staff Association of Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center.; Helms-Estabrookes, N. (2001). CLQT: Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.; Hux, K. (2003). Assisting survivors of traumatic brain injury. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.; Hux, K. (2011). Cognitive-communication deficits. En K. Hux (Ed.), Assisting survivors of traumatic brain injury: The role of speech language pathologists (2nd ed.) (pp. 121–184) Austin, X: Pro-ed.; Hux, K., Beukelman, D. R., Dombrovskis, M., y Snyder, R. (1993). Semantic organization fol¬lowing traumatic brain injury. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology, 1, 121-131.; Hux, K., Burke, R., Elliot, J., y Ross, M. (2001). Communication interaction differences be¬tween natural speakers and AAC users with traumatic brain injuries. Journal of Medical, Speech, Language Pathology, 9, 71-86.; Keenan, J., y Barnhart, K. (1993). Development of yes/no systems in individuals with severe traumatic brain injuries. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 184 – 190. doi:10.1080/07434619312331276591; Kim, Y. H., Yoo, W. K., Ko, M. H., Park, C., Kim, S. T., y Na, D. L. (2009). Plasticity of the attentional network after brain injury and cognitive rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23 (5), 468-477. doi:10.1177/1545968308328728; Koul, R., Arvidson, H. H., y Pennington, G. S. (1997). Intervention for persons with acquired disorders. En L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, y H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and Alter¬native Communication. A Handbook of Principles and Practices (pp. 340-366). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.; Ladtkow, M., y Culp, D. (1992). Augmentative communication with the traumatically brain injured population. En K. Yorkston (Ed.), Augmentative communication in the medical setting (pp. 139-243). Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.; Ladtkow, M. (1993). Traumatic brain injury and severe expressive communication impair¬ment: The role of augmentative communication. Seminars in Speech and Language, 14, 61-73.; Light, J., Beesley, M., y Collier, B. (1988). Transition through multiple augmentative and alternative communication systems: A three-year case study of a head injury adolescent. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4(1), 2 – 14.; Milikin, C. C. (1997). Symbol systems and vocabulary selection strategies. En S. L. Glen¬nen y D. C. Decoste (Eds.), Handbook of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (pp.97-148). San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.; Mirenda, P., y Locke, P. A. (1989). A comparison of symbol transparency in persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 131-140.; Povlishock, J.T., y Katz, D. I. (2005). Update of neuropathology and neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20 (1), 76-94.; https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RLOG/article/view/59529
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.5209/RLOG.59529
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RLOG/article/view/59529
      https://doi.org/10.5209/RLOG.59529
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.D442FA5D