Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Autologous inclusion technique versus Dacron inclusion technique in modified Ross surgery in adults: a retrospective single-center study ; Интрааортальное окутывание против окутывания дакроновым протезом при выполнении модифицированной операции Росса у взрослых: ретроспективное одноцентровое исследование

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      TSU publishing
    • الموضوع:
      2024
    • Collection:
      Siberian Medical Journal / Сибирский медицинский журнал
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      The Ross procedure has been shown to have excellent long-term outcomes. However, pulmonary autografts remain at risk of dilation in the long-term period. Therefore, the autologous inclusion technique (AIT) and the Dacron inclusion technique (DIT) have been developed. No direct comparison up to date has been reported of these two techniques.Aim: To compare immediate and medium-term results performing various modified techniques of the Ross operation.Material and Methods. The following retrospective study included 43 patients (AIT: 22; DIT: 21) aged 18 years and older with an aortic valve (AV) pathology who underwent modified Ross procedures (AIT and DIT) from January 2014 to December 2019, performed by a single surgeon. The main endpoints were: in-hospital mortality, postoperative AV pressure gradients, time of myocardial ischemia and cardiopulmonary bypass, postoperative complications (resternotomy due to bleeding, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, sternal infection, conduction disorder requiring implantation of a permanent pacemaker, acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis) and mid-term outcomes (freedom from reoperation, freedom from aortic dilatation ≥ 5 cm). The median follow-up period was 23 (12–68) months.Results. The main indication for surgery was aortic regurgitation in 32 patients (74.4%). Bicuspid aortic valve was diagnosed in 29 (67.4%) patients. There were 33 (76.7%) males with an average age of 40 ± 11.7 years. There were no lethal outcomes in both groups. There was also no significant difference in postoperative complications. The peak and mean gradients on the AV were significantly lower in the AIT group than in the DIT group (6 and 4 mmHg vs 8 and 7 mmHg, p = 0.04). Five-year overall survival, freedom from reoperation on AV and PV, and freedom from dilatation of the ascending aorta ≥ 5 cm after modified Ross operation were 97.4%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of overall survival (p = 0.66).Conclusion. Both ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://www.sibjcem.ru/jour/article/view/2071/912; Baumgartner H., Falk V, Bax J.J., De Bonis M., Hamm C., Holm P.J. et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38(36):2739–2791. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.; Ross D.N. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet (London, England). 1967;2(7523):956–958. DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90794-5.; El-Hamamsy I., Eryigit Z., Stevens L.-M., Sarang Z., George R., Clark L. et al. Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2010;376(9740):524–531. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60828-8.; Tsaroev B., Chernov I., Enginoev S., Mustaev M. Survival and freedom from reoperation after the Ross procedure in a Russian adult population: A single-center experience. JTCVS Open. 2022;10:140–147. DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2022.04.026.; Gofus J., Fila P., Drabkova S., Zacek P., Ondrasek J., Nemec P. et al. Ross procedure provides survival benefit over mechanical valve in adults: a propensity-matched nationwide analysis. Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic. Surg. 2022;61:1357–1365. DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezac013.; El-Hamamsy I., Toyoda N., Itagaki S., Stelzer P., Varghese R., Williams E.E. et al. Propensity-matched comparison of the Ross procedure and prosthetic aortic valve replacement in adults. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022;79:805–815. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.057.; Brown J.W., Ruzmetov M., Rodefeld M.D., Mahomed Y., Turrentine M.W. Incidence of and risk factors for pulmonary autograft dilation after Ross aortic valve replacement. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007;83(5):1781–1789. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.066.; Kouchoukos N.T., Masetti P., Nickerson N.J., Castner C.F., Shannon W.D., Dávila-Román V.G. The Ross procedure: long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004;78(3):773–781. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.033.; David T.E., Omran A., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., de Sa M.P., Sonnenberg B. et al. Dilation of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross procedure. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2000;119(2):210–220. DOI:10.1016/S00225223(00)70175-9.; Чернов И.И., Энгиноев С.Т., Кондратьев Д.А., Зеньков А.А., Абдурахманов А.А., Тарасов Д.Г. Операция Дэвида после Росса: серия клинических случаев. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2021;26(S4):4767. DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4767.; Skillington P.D., Mokhles M.M., Takkenberg J.J.M., Larobina M., O’Keefe M., Wynne R. et al. The Ross procedure using autologous support of the pulmonary autograft: Techniques and late results. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2015;149(2 Suppl.):S46–S52. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.068.; Чернов И.И., Энгиноев С.Т., Кондратьев Д.А.,Козьмин Д.Ю., Демецкая В.В., Алиев Э.Р. и др. Пятилетние результаты модифицированной операции Росса у взрослых: опыт одного центра. Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. 2021;25(3):43–50. DOI:10.21688/16813472-2021-3-43-50.; Carrel T., Kadner A. Long-term clinical and imaging follow-up after reinforced pulmonary autograft Ross procedure. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. Pediatr. Card. Surg. Annu. 2016;19(1):59–62. DOI:10.1053/j.pcsu.2015.11.005.; Mazine A., El-Hamamsy I., Verma S., Peterson M.D., Bonow R.O., Yacoub M.H. et al. Ross procedure in adults for cardiologists and cardiac surgeons: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018;72(22):2761–2777. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2200.; Flynn C.D., Bono J.H. De, Muston B., Rattan N., Tian D.H., Larobina M. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes in adults undergoing the Ross procedure. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surgery. 2021;10(4):411–419. DOI:10.21037/acs-2021-rp-30.; Luciani G.B., Mazzucco A. Aortic root disease after the Ross procedure. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2006;21(5):555–560. DOI:10.1097/01.hco.0000245742.93453.1d.; Juthier F., Banfi C., Vincentelli A., Ennezat P.-V., Le Tourneau T., Pinçon C. et al. Modified Ross operation with reinforcement of the pulmonary autograft: Six-year results. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2010;139:1420–1423. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.01.032.; Al Rashidi F., Bhat M., Höglund P., Meurling C., Roijer A., Koul B. The modified Ross operation using a Dacron prosthetic vascular jacket does prevent pulmonary autograft dilatation at 4.5-year follow-up. Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic. Surg. 2010;37(4):928–933. DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.11.008.; Chauvette V., Chamberland M.-È., El-Hamamsy I. A review of pulmonary autograft external support in the Ross procedure. Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 2019;16(11):981–988. DOI:10.1080/17434440.2019.1685380.; https://www.sibjcem.ru/jour/article/view/2071
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.29001/2073-8552-2023-38-4-222-230
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://www.sibjcem.ru/jour/article/view/2071
      https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2023-38-4-222-230
    • Rights:
      Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). ; Авторы рукописи соглашаются со следующим:Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договорённости, касающиеся не-эксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге), со ссылкой на оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать работу в сети Интернет (например, в институтском хранилище или на персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения рукописи данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access).
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.CBE1448C