Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Comparative Analysis of Three Preloaded and One Manual Injector for Intraocular Lens Implantation ; Сравнительный анализ трех предварительно заряженных и одного ручного инжектора для имплантации интраокулярных линз

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
اقرأ أكثر حفظ في قائمتي
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      Ophthalmology
    • الموضوع:
      2023
    • Collection:
      Ophthalmology (E-Journal) / Офтальмология
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Purpose: to evaluate the incision width and implantation time of different IOL models using three preloaded and one manual injector. Patients and methods. 146 patients (160 eyes) including 94 females and 52 males were included in a prospective study. Group I — Isert® (28 patients, 32 eyes); Group II — Multisert® (27 patients, 30 eyes); Group III — Autonome® (45 patients, 50 eyes) and Group IV — Monarch® (46 patients, 48 eyes). mean age of patients was 71.8 ± 11.7 years, follow-up period — 3.0 ± 0.2 months. Results. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the groups when comparing the incision width before IOL implantation. After lens implantation, the incision width in group I was significantly higher than in groups II (p = 0.04), III (p = 0.037) and IV (p = 0.029). There were no significant differences in incision width after IOL implantation between groups II, III, and IV (p > 0.05). The average increase in corneal incision width in group I was 0.6 mm, and for groups II, III, and IV it ranged from 0.2 to 0.3 mm. Groups II, III, and IV showed lower values of surgically induced astigmatism compared with group I (0.47 ± 0.06 D, 0.41 ± 0.06 D, and 0.44 ± 0.07 D compared with 1.12 ± 0.17 D, respectively; p < 0.05 for all groups). No significant differences were found between groups II, III, and IV. Minimum implantation time was observed for groups II and III, maximum for groups I and IV, with a mean difference of about 30 seconds. Differences when comparing the mean IOL implantation time were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion. This paper presents the first worldwide comparative analysis of four IOL implantation systems, including Isert®, Multisert®, Autonome®, and Monarch®. The new Multisert® IOL implantation system has similar advantages to the known monofocal IOL injectors with respect to corneal incision width, surgically induced astigmatism magnitude, and time required for IOL implantation. IOL implantation time did not depend on the type of implantation (hydro- ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2167/1124; Borkenstein AF, Packard R, Dhubhghaill SN, Lockington D, Donnenfeld ED, Borkenstein EM. Clear corneal incision, an important step in modern cataract surgery: a review. Eye (Lond). 2023 Feb 14. doi:10.1038/s41433-023-02440-z. Epub ahead of print.; Jin C, Chen X, Law A, Kang Y, Wang X, Xu W, Yao K. Different-sized incisions for phacoemulsification in age-related cataract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9(9):CD010510. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010510.pub2.; Alio JL, Soria F, Abdou AA. Femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery followed by coaxial phacoemulsification or microincisional cataract surgery: differences and advantages. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25(1):81–88. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000017.; Elkady B, Piñero D, Alió JL. Corneal incision quality: microincision cataract surgery versus microcoaxial phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:466–474. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.047.; Arboleda A, Arrieta E, Aguilar MC, Sotolongo K, Nankivil D, Parel JA. Variations in intraocular lens injector dimensions and corneal incision architecture after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(5):656–661. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.047.; Khoramnia R, Yildirim TM, Weindler J, Naujokaitis T, Dzhambazova M, Auffarth GU. Preloaded injectors used in a clinical study: videographic assessment and laboratory analysis of injector nozzle damage. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021;47:1338– 1344. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000587.; Dewey S, Beiko G, Braga-Mele R, Nixon DR, Raviv T, Rosenthal K; ASCRS Cataract Clinical Committee, Instrumentation and IOLs Subcommittee. Microincisions in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(9):1549–1557. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.07.006.; Крысанов И.С., Трубилин В.Н., Крысанова В.С., Ермакова В.Ю. Опыт применения различных предзагруженных систем для имплантации интраокулярных линз в Российской Федерации. Офтальмология. 2022;19(2):299–306.; Guarnieri A, Moreno-Montañés J, Sabater AL, Gosende-Chico I, Bonet-Farriol E. Final incision size after cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens implantation using 2 techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:1675–1681. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.039.; Ang M, Evans JR, Mehta JS. Manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with posterior chamber intraocular lens for age-related cataract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD008811. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008811.pub2.; Espiritu CR, Bernardo JP Jr. Incision sizes at different stages of phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:2115– 2120. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.06.037.; Kohnen T, Klaproth OK. Incision sizes before and after implantation of SN60WF intraocular lenses using the Monarch injector system with C and D cartridges. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(10):1748–1753. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.031.; Allen D, Habib M, Steel D. Final incision size after implantation of a hydrophobic acrylic aspheric intraocular lens: new motorized injector versus standard manual injector. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(2):249–255. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.08.038.; Першин К.Б., Пашинова Н.Ф., Цыганков А.Ю., Корнеева Е.А. Анализ эффективности и безопасности имплантации новой асферической гидрофобной акриловой монофокальной ИОЛ в краткосрочном периоде наблюдения. Офтальмология. 2021;18(4):845–851.; Першин К.Б., Пашинова Н.Ф., Коновалова М.М., Цыганков А.Ю., Коновалов М.Е., Темиров Н.Э. Анализ краткосрочных результатов имплантации новой моноблочной асферической дифракционной трифокальной интраокулярной линзы. Офтальмология. 2019;16(1):19–25.; Першин К.Б., Пашинова Н.Ф., Цыганков А.Ю., Антонов Е.А., Косова И.В., Корнеева Е.А. Недифракционная интраокулярная линза с расширенной глубиной фокуса, формирующая волновой фронт: первый опыт имплантации. Офтальмология. 2022;19(4):774–781.; Yildirim TM, Łabuz G, Baur ID, Poompokawat P, Knorz MC, Auffarth GU, Khoramnia R. Corneal Incision Enlargement in Two Preloaded Intraocular Lens Injectors: An Intraindividual In Vivo Study. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(5):331–336. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210204-01.; Mendicute J, Amzallag T, Wang L, Martinez AA. Comparison of incision size and intraocular lens performance after implantation with three preloaded systems and one manual delivery system. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1495–1503. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S166776.; Liu J, Wolfe P, Hernandez V, Kohnen T. Comparative assessment of the corneal incision enlargement of 4 preloaded IOL delivery systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(7):1041–1046. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000214.; Haldipurkar SS, Shetty V, Haldipurkar T, Dhamankar R, Sehdev N, Khatib Z, Nagvekar P, Mhatre P, Setia MS. Incision size changes after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation: comparison of 2 preloaded IOL implantation injectors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(2):222–227. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000014.; Khoramnia R, Baur ID, Łabuz G, Chychko L, Köppe MK, Hallak MK, Auffarth GU. Enlargement of main corneal incision: clinical intraindividual comparison of two preloaded intraocular lens injectors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023;49(2):165–170. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001064.; https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2167
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.18008/1816-5095-2023-3-431-436
    • Rights:
      Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). ; Авторы, публикующие в данном журнале, соглашаются со следующим:Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договорённости, касающиеся не-эксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге), со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access).
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.6D126845