Being Human in the Wrong Brain: On Punishment, Medication, and Social Misreading of Emotional Precision

This transdisciplinary inquiry documents how psychiatric diagnoses—specifically Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features (MDD-P), and Tourette-like symptoms—function as institutional weapons of epistemicide, pathologizing neurodivergent cognition to suppress dissent and enable academic exploitation. Through integrating literary analysis, neuroscience, sociology, law, and neuropsychopharmacology, the study exposes how clinical frameworks weaponize emotional precision: expressions of moral injury are recast as "psychosis," trauma adaptations become "pathological fragmentation," and involuntary stress responses manifesting as tics are labeled "neurological disorders." Neuroscientific evidence dismantles the biological determinism underpinning these diagnoses, demonstrating how psychotropics (e.g., Quetiapine, Sertraline, Alprazolam) enforce neuroconformity by chemically blunting superior pattern processing capacities—simultaneously inducing iatrogenic harm while silencing critique. Legally, diagnostic labels create preemptive discreditation architectures that nullify testimony; politically, they shield institutional predators through medicalized gaslighting. Crucially, this work proves that resistance emerges through embodied counter-narratives: the researcher’s medication-induced symptoms and tic manifestations became somatic semiotics articulating systemic violence, while scholarly production constituted neuroplastic restructuring that reclaimed agency. The findings demand abolition of coercive psychodiagnostic practices and recognition of cognitive sovereignty as a fundamental human right.