نبذة مختصرة : Due to the artifacts of volume conduction, localization of interacting brain sources is an intricate issue in inverse calculations of EEG and MEG data. Since non-interacting brain sources do not contribute systematically, i.e. apart from random fluctuations around zero, to the imaginary part of cross-spectrum calculated from EEG/MEG data, these measures are powerful tools to study functional brain connectivity from noninvasive electrophysiological data. MUltiple SIgnal Classification (MUSIC), is a standard localization method.In one of the MUSIC variants called Recursively Applied and Projected MUSIC (RAP-MUSIC), multiple iterations are proposed in order to decrease the location estimation uncertainties introduced by subspace estimation errors. Since we are interested in the interacting sources, I propose to apply the existing subspace method “RAP-MUSIC” to the subspace found from the dominant singular vectors of the imaginary part of cross-spectrum. Secondly, to estimate the specific sources interacting with each other, I use a modified LCMV-beamformer approach in which the source direction for each voxel is determined by maximizing the imaginary part of coherency with respect to a given reference. Subspace based algorithms, such as MUSIC and RAP-MUSIC are very sensitive to the choice of subspace. In case the subspace is not accurately estimated, the sources which best explain the data are not localized optimally. RAP-MUSIC is therefore applicable in this form, i.e. on the subspace spanned by the eigenvectors of the imaginary part of cross-spectrum rather than the eigenvectors of covariance matrix, only if the number of interacting sources is even. The reason is that the imaginary part of cross-spectrum is antisymmetric and all eigenvalues occur in pairs. To solve this issue, a new method called Self-Consistent MUSIC (SC-MUSIC) is suggested which is based on the idea that the presence of several sources has a bias on the localization of each source through the bias on the estimation of the subspace. This bias ...
No Comments.