نبذة مختصرة : BACKGROUND: The growing use of real-time PCR (qPCR) as a diagnostic method for bovine TB (bTB) requires rapid and effective DNA extraction methods, which are crucial for its success. Automated DNA extraction methods based on magnetic beads are a promising alternative to conventional silica column-based protocols (COL protocol) due to their high throughput capacity and reduced hands-on time. This study aimed to assess the performance of the MagMax CORE Nucleic Acid Purification kit and the KingFisher Flex instrument (KF protocol) as an alternative for scaling up the use of qPCR in bTB diagnosis. METHODOLOGY: Performance was evaluated with two different real-time PCR (qPCR) protocols, based on the IS6110 element and the QuantiFast and VetMAX™ (QF and VM protocols) kits, on 145 frozen tissue homogenates confirmed as either bTB-positive or negative through a composite reference standard based on microbiological culture, column-based extraction, and qPCR, as well as on negative tissue samples spiked with 10(6) to 10(3) CFU/ml of M. bovis BCG. RESULTS: The performance of both qPCR protocols was very high on samples extracted using the KF protocol, with positive percent agreement (PPA) values of 89.04% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 79.54–95.15%] and 93.15% [95% CI: 84.74–97.74%] for the QF and VM protocols, respectively, and negative percent agreement (NPA) values of 100% [95% CI: 95.01–100.00%]. A higher variability was identified in samples analysed with the same qPCR protocol but different extraction methods. Higher Ct values were identified for samples extracted using the KF protocol in both routine and spiked samples, likely due to using the same amount of starting material for both extraction methods, which was lower than recommended by the manufacturer for the KF protocol. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate that the MagMAX CORE Nucleic Acid Purification kit coupled with a KingFisher Flex instrument is a valuable alternative for the extraction of MTBC DNA from bovine tissues. However, the increased variability and Ct values suggest that a larger amount of starting material is recommended for this methodology, warranting further studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12917-024-04427-8.
Rights: CC BY NC ND
URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
Processing Request
No Comments.