نبذة مختصرة : ObjectiveSystematically describe the characteristics of rural specialists, their work and job satisfaction by geographical location of work.DesignCross‐sectional.Setting and participantsThree thousand, four hundred and seventy‐nine medical specialists participating in the 2014 Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL) survey of doctors.Main outcome measureLocation of practice, whether metropolitan, large (>50 000 population) or small regional centres (ResultSpecialists working in large regional centres had similar characteristics to metropolitan specialists, however, those in small regional centres were more likely men, later career, overseas‐trained and less likely to work privately. Rural specialists had more on‐call requirements and poorer professional development opportunities. However, satisfaction with work hours, remuneration, variety of work, level of responsibility, opportunities to use abilities and overall satisfaction did not differ. Specialists in general medicine and general surgery were significantly more likely to work rurally compared with anaesthetists, particularly in small regional centres, whereas a range of other relevant specialists had lower than the average rural distribution and paediatricians and endocrinologists were significantly less likely to work in large regional centres.ConclusionRural specialists are just as satisfied as metropolitan counterparts reporting equivalent variety and responsibility at work. Better support for on‐call demands and access to professional development could attract more specialists to rural practice. Increased rural training opportunities and regional workforce planning is needed to develop and recruit relevant specialties. Specifically, targeted support is warranted for training and development of specialists in general medicine and general surgery and overseas‐trained specialists, who provide essential services in smaller regional centres.
Processing Request
No Comments.