Comparison of Emergency Physicians' and Hospitalists' Attitudes Toward Fecal Occult Blood Testing in Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Publisher: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101476450 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1936-9018 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1936900X NLM ISO Abbreviation: West J Emerg Med Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: <2011>- : Irvine, CA : Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine
Original Publication: Orange, CA : California Chapter of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine

Occult Blood* ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage*/diagnosis ; Hospitalists*/psychology ; Hospitalists*/statistics & numerical data ; Attitude of Health Personnel* ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'*/statistics & numerical data ; Physicians*/psychology; Humans ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Male ; Female ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Middle Aged ; Guaiac

Introduction: The guaiac fecal occult blood test, originally designed for colorectal cancer screening, is frequently used in emergency departments (ED) to detect occult gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. However, the test has low sensitivity and specificity, leading to potential false positives and negatives. This study evaluates the current practices and perceptions of emergency physicians and hospitalists regarding the utility of the guaiac test in the setting of suspected GI bleeding in the ED.
Objective: Our primary aim in this study was to evaluate the current practice and views of emergency physicians and hospitalists on the utility of the stool guaiac test in the ED.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter survey from January 3-April 3, 2024, across four hospital systems, targeting attending physicians in the ED and hospitalists. Participants were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the stool guaiac test on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Results: Response rates were 47/93 (50.5%) for emergency attendings and 9/18 (50%) for hospitalists. Emergency attendings were significantly less likely than hospitalists to agree that stool guaiac testing is important for evaluating GI bleeding (31% vs 67%, P < .001). More than half of emergency attendings (55%) reported often performing the test, while 44% of hospitalists reported frequently requesting it before accepting a patient. Although 70% of emergency attendings believed that guaiac results influence hospitalists' admission decisions (P = .02), 67% of hospitalists stated they would accept a patient with suspected GI bleeding even without a result. Despite rating the test as important, only 33% of hospitalists felt that stool guaiac testing frequently changes management during hospitalization. Overall, the groups showed distinct attitudes regarding the utility and impact of stool guaiac testing.
Conclusion: The guaiac fecal occult blood test remains widely used despite skepticism among emergency attendings regarding its importance. Hospitalists were more likely to request the test but acknowledged it rarely changes patient management. These findings highlight the need for re-evaluation of guaiac testing in acute care settings and improved communication between ED and inpatient teams. Further research should explore the clinical impact of removing routine stool guaiac testing.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 May;115(5):662-670. (PMID: 31972617)
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Sep;28(8):421-6. (PMID: 25014182)
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 01;59(3):227-231. (PMID: 38668714)
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Apr 15;72(2):43. (PMID: 18483608)
Cureus. 2024 Oct 6;16(10):e70922. (PMID: 39502994)
Cureus. 2024 Apr 1;16(4):e57406. (PMID: 38694647)

9000-29-7 (Guaiac)

Date Created: 20251211 Date Completed: 20251211 Latest Revision: 20251230

20251231

PMC12698143

10.5811/westjem.47193

41380073