Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

AI-Driven quality assurance in mammography: Enhancing quality control efficiency through automated phantom image evaluation in South Korea.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
      Purpose: To develop and validate a deep learning-based model for automated evaluation of mammography phantom images, with the goal of improving inter-radiologist agreement and enhancing the efficiency of quality control within South Korea's national accreditation system.
      Materials and Methods: A total of 5,917 mammography phantom images were collected from the Korea Institute for Accreditation of Medical Imaging (KIAMI). After preprocessing, 5,813 images (98.2%) met quality standards and were divided into training, test, and evaluation datasets. Each image included 16 artificial lesions (fibers, specks, masses) scored by certified radiologists. Images were preprocessed, standardized, and divided into 16 subimages. An EfficientNetV2_L-based model, selected for its balance of accuracy and computational efficiency, was used to predict both lesion existence and scoring adequacy (score of 0.0, 0.5, 1.0). Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-score, area under the curve (AUC), and explainable AI techniques.
      Results: The model achieved classification accuracy of 87.84%, 93.43%, and 86.63% for fibers (F1: 0.7292, 95% bootstrap CI: 0.711, 0.747), specks (F1: 0. 7702, 95% bootstrap CI: 0.750, 0.791), and masses (F1: 0.7594, 95% bootstrap CI: 0.736, 0.781), respectively. AUCs exceeded 0.97 for 0.0-score detection and above 0.94 for 0.5-score detection. Notably, the model demonstrated strong discriminative capability in 1.0-score detection across all lesion types. Model interpretation experiments confirmed adherence to guideline criteria: fiber scoring reflected the "longest visible segment" rule; speck detection showed score transitions at two and four visible points; and mass evaluation prioritized circularity but showed some size-related bias. Saliency maps confirmed alignment with guideline-defined lesion features while ignoring irrelevant artifacts.
      Conclusion: The proposed deep learning model accurately assessed mammography phantom images according to guideline criteria and achieved expert-level performance. By automating the evaluation process, the model can improve scoring consistency and significantly enhance the efficiency and scalability of quality control workflows.
      (Copyright: © 2025 Yun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
    • References:
      BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):216. (PMID: 36476319)
      Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 03;23(4):195-198. (PMID: 38024184)
      Comput Biol Med. 2023 Apr;156:106668. (PMID: 36863192)
      IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2020 Feb;42(2):318-327. (PMID: 30040631)
      Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 31;23(17):. (PMID: 37688012)
      Korean J Radiol. 2013 Sep-Oct;14(5):701-10. (PMID: 24043961)
      J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Sep;20(9):842-851. (PMID: 37506964)
      Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 29;9(1):12495. (PMID: 31467326)
      Med Image Anal. 2024 Jan;91:103000. (PMID: 37883822)
      PLoS One. 2024 Jan 29;19(1):e0297519. (PMID: 38285673)
      Sci Rep. 2023 May 1;13(1):7066. (PMID: 37127674)
      Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 2;13(1):3545. (PMID: 36864167)
      Radiology. 2023 Feb;306(2):e223121. (PMID: 36648345)
      Phys Med. 2022 Oct;102:1-8. (PMID: 36030664)
      Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110369. (PMID: 35691109)
      J Imaging. 2024 Sep 25;10(10):. (PMID: 39452402)
      Acta Radiol. 2023 Mar;64(3):971-986. (PMID: 35866198)
      Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Oct;46(10):2819-2833. (PMID: 32709519)
      Korean J Radiol. 2023 Dec;24(12):1173-1175. (PMID: 38016676)
      IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Dec;67(12):3317-3326. (PMID: 32305886)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20250908 Date Completed: 20250908 Latest Revision: 20250911
    • الموضوع:
      20250911
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC12416691
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0330091
    • الرقم المعرف:
      40920794