The Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative and Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding programs: applying the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Spread, Scale up, Sustainability (NASSS) health technology adoption framework to analyze challenges to hospital implementation in Australia and Indonesia.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101251562 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1746-4358 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17464358 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int Breastfeed J Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2006-

Breast Feeding* ; Health Promotion*/organization & administration ; Health Promotion*/methods; Humans ; Indonesia ; Australia ; Female ; Infant, Newborn ; Hospitals ; Program Evaluation ; Infant

Background: Global uptake of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (Ten Steps) is low, and sustainability is a challenge. Although both programs are backed by strong evidence and international endorsement, their integration into national health systems has been inconsistent and often lacks institutional prioritization. This study aimed to analyze challenges to implementation of the BFHI and Ten Steps programs in Australia and Indonesia.
Methods: We used the Non-adoption, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework and categorized the relative complexity of implementing the program into each setting.
Results: Most BFHI/Ten Steps implementation domains were categorized as complicated or complex, and the policy level, organizational and community settings for the intervention overlapped for most domains. Despite the cultural and health systems differences between Australia and Indonesia, both environments present challenges and also unique opportunities for the uptake and scale up of BFHI/Ten Steps with the right support and adaptation. Importantly, the complexity was not only technical but also institutional, with implementation often relying on individual champions rather than systemic support.
Conclusions: Systems that require and motivate compliance to the WHO Code (Step 1) and optimize healthcare professionals' (HCP) lactation support capacity (Step 2) are crucial, and need to be regulated and coordinated from the national level. To achieve optimal support for initiating and establishing breastfeeding, governments, facilities, and relevant HCPs must support birth models that ensure women receive continuity of care and adequate time with skilled midwives, who in turn are educated in ways that are free from commercial influence (Step 1). These policy and clinical level steps can reduce the misalignment of costs and benefits of BFHI and Ten Steps implementation. Strengthening institutional commitment and embedding BFHI into national quality frameworks may further enhance sustainability and scale-up. A coordinated, system-wide approach is essential to ensure these evidence-based practices become standard in maternal and newborn care.
(© 2025. The Author(s).)

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Approval to conduct the study was obtained from The Australian National University protocol number 2019/227, Calvary Public Hospital Bruce Ethics Committee and Airlangga University Ethics Committee number 162/KEP/2019, prior to data collection. Consent for publication: All participants in the focus groups provided written informed consent before participating in the study. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

BMC Pediatr. 2018 May 22;18(1):170. (PMID: 29788928)
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Jan;14(1):. (PMID: 28795789)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):. (PMID: 35564807)
Yale J Biol Med. 2021 Sep 30;94(3):429-458. (PMID: 34602882)
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 May 20;15(1):46. (PMID: 32434558)
J Hum Lact. 2022 Nov;38(4):780-791. (PMID: 35792378)
Women Birth. 2019 Jun;32(3):e323-e333. (PMID: 30098980)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17737. (PMID: 31689820)
J Hum Lact. 2021 Aug;37(3):532-538. (PMID: 33653203)
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Mar 17;4(3):e0000418. (PMID: 40096260)
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jan;15 Suppl 1:e12724. (PMID: 30748119)
Lancet. 2023 Feb 11;401(10375):472-485. (PMID: 36764313)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 19;21(1):385. (PMID: 34011312)
Nurs Open. 2021 Nov;8(6):3394-3402. (PMID: 33939303)
Int Breastfeed J. 2022 Dec 3;17(1):84. (PMID: 36461020)
Pediatrics. 2007 Feb;119 Suppl 1:S38-46. (PMID: 17272583)
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):119. (PMID: 27766969)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 30;18(21):. (PMID: 34769946)
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Apr 8;15(1):23. (PMID: 32268920)
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Feb;77(2):703-714. (PMID: 33210369)
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Sep;5(9):619-630. (PMID: 34245677)
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0191854. (PMID: 29489841)
Lancet. 2023 Feb 11;401(10375):486-502. (PMID: 36764314)
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 7;20(1):22. (PMID: 33413439)
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 01;19(11):e367. (PMID: 29092808)
Matern Child Nutr. 2016 Jul;12(3):402-17. (PMID: 26924775)
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jul;15(3):e12778. (PMID: 30623576)
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Jul;14(3):e12589. (PMID: 29411938)
Med J Aust. 2008 Sep 1;189(5):254-6. (PMID: 18759719)
Lancet. 2023 Feb 11;401(10375):503-524. (PMID: 36764315)

Date Created: 20250813 Date Completed: 20250825 Latest Revision: 20250826

20250903

PMC12345096

10.1186/s13006-025-00754-0

40804413