Patients' Attitudes Towards Integrating Environmental Sustainability Into Healthcare Decision-Making: An Interview Study.

Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9815926 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1369-7625 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13696513 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Health Expect Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Wiley, c1998-

Decision Making, Shared* ; Patient Participation* ; Delivery of Health Care* ; Environment*; Climate Change ; Qualitative Research ; Interviews as Topic ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Humans ; Female ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged

Introduction: The ethical obligation to reduce the environmental impact of healthcare systems prompts an exploration of if and when environmental concerns should be integrated into clinical decision-making. In this study, we aimed to elucidate patients' attitudes regarding the provision of environmental information in healthcare decision-making and to identify preferred approaches for integrating these considerations into patient-provider consultations.
Methods: This interview study served as an in-depth follow-up of a survey study on gynaecological patients' perspectives on environmental sustainability within healthcare settings. We conducted semistructured interviews with 14 patients from two Dutch outpatient clinics between February and May 2024. We employed reflexive thematic analysis to analyse the data.
Results: Five main themes were developed from the data: (1) Patients are an integral part of the transition to sustainable healthcare, (2) Patients are open to information on environmental impact of healthcare, (3) Information on environmental impact should be tailored to the individual patient and context, (4) Patients vary in preferences for involvement in decision-making related to environmental sustainability and (5) Patients prioritize individual health over environmental concerns in healthcare decision-making.
Conclusion: The findings of our study underscore the importance of integrating sustainability into clinical decision-making, aligning with bioethical principles and the expectations and goals of patients. By ensuring that environmental considerations are introduced in a personalized and context-appropriate manner within patient-provider interactions, healthcare can foster greater support for sustainable practices.
Patient or Public Contribution: Patients were involved in developing the pre-interview questionnaire. The preliminary results of the study were presented to healthcare professionals from various backgrounds during a meeting of the Dutch Green Care Alliance, after which the input was incorporated into the interpretation of the study results. Finally, the complete manuscript was presented to representatives from the Dutch Patient Federation to obtain their input on the interpretation and implications of our research. The interpretation of our results aligned with the findings from their recent national inquiries, which included data from over 9300 patients within their network. Consequently, no changes were made to the manuscript's discussion.
(© 2025 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Jan;7(1):e1. (PMID: 36608939)
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Dec;26(4):507-515. (PMID: 37584839)
Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Jan;7(1):e15-e17. (PMID: 36608942)
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1348-1351. (PMID: 34551226)
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020 Aug 05;4(4):416-423. (PMID: 32793869)
BJOG. 2024 Apr;131(5):555-567. (PMID: 37604701)
Int J Transgend Health. 2022 Oct 25;24(1):1-6. (PMID: 36713144)
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Apr 1;36(2):188-195. (PMID: 36700462)
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Aug;28(4):218-221. (PMID: 36522136)
Lancet. 2023 Dec 16;402(10419):2346-2394. (PMID: 37977174)
BJOG. 2024 Apr;131(5):684-689. (PMID: 38073255)
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. (PMID: 24979285)
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;76(3):350-352. (PMID: 31959535)
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 09;11(6):e0157014. (PMID: 27280706)
J Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 21;50(7):498-500. (PMID: 38290854)
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Feb;5(2):e66-e68. (PMID: 33581064)
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1785-1788. (PMID: 37469280)
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;31(10):1037-1049. (PMID: 39180226)
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Jan 10;8(1):23814683221148651. (PMID: 36643615)
BMJ. 2023 Sep 28;382:e076963. (PMID: 37770093)
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):e50-8. (PMID: 23180999)
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Jan;130:108427. (PMID: 39243531)
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;88(7):3016-3022. (PMID: 34719810)
J Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 21;50(7):489-493. (PMID: 37833040)
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1591-1595. (PMID: 33353840)
Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Jul;7(7):e600-e610. (PMID: 37438001)
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):62-71. (PMID: 31829111)
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):688-695. (PMID: 28559034)
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(1):2284261. (PMID: 38010828)
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):2023-2039. (PMID: 37394739)
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 8;14(1):e076280. (PMID: 38191257)

This study was supported by the Doctoral School, Amsterdam UMC PhD Scholarship.

Keywords: climate change; environmental impact; environmental sustainability; green bioethics; green informed consent; shared decision‐making

Date Created: 20250120 Date Completed: 20250129 Latest Revision: 20250212

20250212

PMC11743189

10.1111/hex.70155

39828934