Standardized distances for placement of REBOA in patients with aortic stenosis.

Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-

Aortic Valve Stenosis/*surgery ; Balloon Occlusion/*methods ; Endovascular Procedures/*methods ; Resuscitation/*methods; Female ; Femoral Artery ; Heart Arrest/prevention & control ; Hemorrhage/prevention & control ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a technique where a balloon is advanced through the common femoral artery and temporarily inflated for treatment of cardiac arrest or non-compressible haemorrhage. The aim of this study was to measure intravascular distances relevant for correct placement of the REBOA catheter using computer tomographic (CT) scans. In a series of CT scans of the aorta from 100 patients diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis planned for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, we measured the intravascular distance from the insertion site in the common femoral artery to two potential zones for placement of the REBOA catheter; between the left subclavian artery and the celiac trunk (Zone 1), as well as between the aortic bifurcation and the distal take-off of the renal arteries (Zone 3). The mean (± SD) intravascular distance from the femoral artery to intra-aortic Zone 1 was 36 (± 2.5) cm for the lower border and 60 (± 4.1) cm for the upper border, respectively. For intra-aortic Zone 3, the mean (± SD) intravascular distance was 21 (± 2.1) cm to the lower border and 31 (± 2.3) cm to the upper border. Calculated potentially safe intervals for placement of the REBOA in Zone 1 was with 99.7% likelihood between 43 and 48 cm. No similar potentially safe interval could be calculated for Zone 3. According to this cohort study of patients with severe aortic stenosis, the balloon of the REBOA catheter should travel intraarterially between 43 (lower limit) and 48 cm (upper limit) from the site of insertion into the common femoral artery, which would lead to correct placement in intra-aortic Zone 1 in 99.7% of cases. In contrast, no potential safety interval could be similarly defined for insertion in Zone 3.

Morrison, J. J. et al. A systematic review of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the management of hemorrhagic shock. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg.80, 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000913 (2016). (PMID: 10.1097/TA.000000000000091326816219)
van Oostendorp, S. E., Tan, E. C. & Geeraedts, L. M. Prehospital control of life-threatening truncal and junctional haemorrhage is the ultimate challenge in optimizing trauma care; a review of treatment options and their applicability in the civilian trauma setting. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med.24, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0301-9 (2016). (PMID: 10.1186/s13049-016-0301-9)
Sesma, J. et al. Effect of intra-aortic occlusion balloon in external thoracic compressions during CPR in pigs. Am. J. Emerg. Med.20, 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajem.2002.32627 (2002). (PMID: 10.1053/ajem.2002.3262712216044)
Markov, N. P. et al. Physiologic tolerance of descending thoracic aortic balloon occlusion in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock. Surgery (United States)153, 848–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.12.001 (2013). (PMID: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.12.001)
Avaro, J. P. et al. Forty-minute endovascular aortic occlusion increases survival in an experimental model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock caused by abdominal trauma. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care71, 720–725. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318221a94a (2011). (PMID: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318221a94a)
Ribeiro Junior, M. A. F. et al. The complications associated with Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA). World J. Emerg. Surg.13, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0181-6 (2018). (PMID: 10.1186/s13017-018-0181-6297740485948672)
Stannard, A., Eliason, J. L. & Rasmussen, T. E. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as an adjunct for hemorrhagic shock. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care71, 1869–1872. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823fe90c (2011). (PMID: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823fe90c)
Ordoñez, C. A. et al. Current use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in trauma. Colomb. J. Anesthesiol.45, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcae.2017.09.007 (2017). (PMID: 10.1016/j.rcae.2017.09.007)
Martinelli, T. et al. Intra-aortic balloon occlusion to salvage patients with life-threatening hemorrhagic shocks from pelvic fractures. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care68, 942–948. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c40579 (2010). (PMID: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c40579)
Irahara, T. et al. Retrospective study of the effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock. World J. Emerg. Surg.10, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-10-1 (2015). (PMID: 10.1186/1749-7922-10-1255988384297416)
Sadek, S. et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in the pre-hospital setting: an additional resuscitation option for uncontrolled catastrophic haemorrhage. Resuscitation107, 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.06.029 (2016). (PMID: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.06.02927377669)
Wasicek, P. J. et al. Successful and unsuccessful blind placement of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) catheters through damaged arteries: a report of three cases. J. Endovasc. Resusc. Trauma Manag.2, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.v2i1.43 (2018). (PMID: 10.26676/jevtm.v2i1.43)
Scott, D. J. et al. A novel fluoroscopy-free, resuscitative endovascular aortic balloon occlusion system in a model of hemorrhagic shock. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg.75, 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182946746 (2013). (PMID: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318294674623940855)
Morrison, J. J. et al. Prospective evaluation of the correlation between torso height and aortic anatomy in respect of a fluoroscopy free aortic balloon occlusion system. Surgery (United States)155, 1044–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.036 (2014). (PMID: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.036)
MacTaggart, J. N. et al. Morphometric roadmaps to improve accurate device delivery for fluoroscopy-free resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg.80, 941–946. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001043 (2016). (PMID: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001043270155804874847)
Pezy, P. et al. Fixed-distance model for balloon placement during fluoroscopy-free resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a civilian population. JAMA Surg.152, 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4757 (2017). (PMID: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4757279736705470425)
Eliason, J. L. et al. CT Correlation of skeletal landmarks and vascular anatomy in civilian adult trauma patients. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg.87, 1. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002247 (2019). (PMID: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002247)
Team, R. C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Found. Stat. Comput., Vienna, 2020).
Okada, Y., Narumiya, H., Ishi, W. & Iiduka, R. Anatomical landmarks for safely implementing resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in zone 1 without fluoroscopy. Scand. J. Trauma. Resusc. Emerg. Med.25, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0411-z (2017). (PMID: 10.1186/s13049-017-0411-z)
Linnebur, M. et al. Emergent non-image-guided resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) catheter placement: a cadaver-based study. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg.81, 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001106 (2016). (PMID: 10.1097/TA.000000000000110627192466)
Fodden, D. I., Crosby, A. C. & Channer, K. S. Doppler measurement of cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J. Accid. Emerg. Med.13, 379–382 (1996). (PMID: 10.1136/emj.13.6.379)
Patil, K. D., Halperin, H. R. & Becker, L. B. Cardiac arrest: resuscitation and reperfusion. Circ. Res.116, 2041–2049. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304495 (2015). (PMID: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304495260442555920653)
Girotra, S., Chan, P. S. & Bradley, S. M. Post-resuscitation care following out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest. Heart101, 1943–1949. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307450 (2015). (PMID: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307450263854514780335)
Liu, S. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an extremely tortuous S-shaped aorta. Case Rep. Cardiol.2017, 2936513. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2936513 (2017). (PMID: 10.1155/2017/2936513283524805352869)

Date Created: 20200810 Date Completed: 20210209 Latest Revision: 20210807

20240829

PMC7414869

10.1038/s41598-020-70364-9

32770039