人文社科领域高影响力作者有组织科研合作特征 对论文产出的影响.

The Impact of Organized Research Collaboration Characteristics Among High-Impact Authors in Humanities and Social Sciences on Paper Output.

[Purpose/Significance] This study explores the characteristics of organized research collaboration among humanities and social sciences (HSS) researchers and their impact on paper output, aiming to optimize such collaboration and provide theoretical and practical support for enhancing the effectiveness of organized research in HSS. [Method/Process] We selected 163 high-impact scholars serving as chief investigators of Major Project supported by the National Social Science Fundation of China from 2015 to 2021 as the research subjects, and used their papers funded by these projects and published in the Chinese key journals as the data source. Nine explanatory variables (e. g., co-authorship degree, co-authorship rate) and five explained variables (e. g., first-author publication volume, relative publication volume) were designed. Factor analysis was employed to reduce dimensionality and extract three common factors of organized research collaboration: "collaboration stability and intensity," "collaboration breadth and depth," and "collaboration diversity." Combined with control variables such as gender, educational background, and administrative positions, Spearman correlation analysis and multiple linear regression models were used to empirically test the impact of organized research collaboration characteristics on academic paper output. [Results/Conclusions] Under the organized research paradigm: 1) Organized research collaboration characteristics' common factors exhibit a significant inhibiting effect on the quantity of academic paper output; 2) Organized research collaboration characteristics demonstrate a significant enhancing effect on the proportion of high-impact papers; 3) Individual characteristics show no significant effect on academic paper output. Corresponding implications are drawn from the perspective of promoting high-quality development of organized research collaboration in HSS. We put forward some suggestions. Research management institutions should promote interdisciplinary and cross-domain collaborative innovation, optimize research evaluation to guide the quality of cooperation, and strengthen regional collaboration and international cooperation networks. Research institutions should enhance the development and management of research teams, intensify academic exchanges and capacity training, and optimize the allocation of research resources. Researchers should dynamically adjust their cooperation strategies, make good use of digital tools to streamline cooperation processes, balance administrative duties with academic outputs, and attach importance to the training of young scholars. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[目的/意义] 探究人文社科研究人员有组织科研合作特征及其对论文产出的影响, 旨在优化有组织科研合作, 为提 升人文社科有组织科研效能提供理论与实践支撑。 [方法/过程] 以 2015—2021 年国家社会科学基金重大项目首席专家中的 163 位高影响力学者为研究对象, 以这些高影响力学者受国家社会科学基金重大项目资助的中文核心期刊论文为数据源, 设 计了 9 个解释变量和 5 个被解释变量, 通过因子分析降维提取"合作稳定性与紧密性""合作广度与深度"和"合作多样性" 三大有组织科研合作公因子, 结合性别、学历背景、行政职务等控制变量, 运用 Spearman 相关分析与多元线性回归模型, 检验有组织科研合作特征对论文产出的影响。 [结果/结论] 在有组织科研范式下: 1) 有组织科研合作特征因子对论文产出数 量呈现显著抑制效应; 2) 有组织科研合作特征对高影响力论文占比具有显著促进作用; 3) 个体特征对论文产出的影响不显 著。从促进人文社科有组织科研合作高质量发展的视角得到相应启示。 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]