The Diagnostic Value of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in the Differential Diagnosis of Azoospermia: Introducing a Concept.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and reliability of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in the differential diagnosis of azoospermia. Materials and methods: Records of 175 patients who had previously been diagnosed with normal-volume, normal-PH azoospermia and who had undergone surgical sperm retrieval were reviewed retrospectively. Patients' preoperative evaluations included a comprehensive history and physical examination and a routine scrotal POCUS performed during their initial consultation by a non-radiologist treating andrologist in a clinic setting. Positive scrotal imaging revealed ectasia of the rete testis and/or dilation of the epididymal ductules. Based on their preoperative assessments, patients were guided to undergo either testicular sperm aspiration (TESA)/microsurgical sperm aspiration (MESA) procedures for those with suspected obstructive azoospermia (OA) or microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) for those with suspected non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Results: Of the 175 patients, 58 patients had normal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels (≤12 IU/L) and normal testicular volume. Thirty of them had no secondary signs of obstruction in their scrotal POCUS and subsequently underwent micro-TESE. All were confirmed to have NOA. Twenty-eight patients demonstrated at least two secondary signs of obstruction on scrotal POCUS. Of these, 15 underwent TESA, and 13 underwent MESA procedures. Twenty-seven patients were confirmed to have OA, and one was confirmed as having NOA. Among this cohort of men, the sensitivity of scrotal POCUS in diagnosing OA was 100%, whereas the specificity was 96.8%. Positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs) were 96.4 and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: Scrotal POCUS is an effective clinical diagnostic tool for distinguishing obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Being noninvasive, safe, and affordable makes it an ideal bedside clinical tool that can serve the skilled non-radiologist clinician reliably. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Clinical Medicine is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)