Ovarian cauterization Versus Cacl2 Injection For "In Situ Ovariectomy" In Female Cats.

المقال يركز على مقارنة جدوى وسلامة الكي المبيضي مقابل حقن كلوريد الكالسيوم (CaCl2) لعملية "استئصال المبيض في الموقع" في القطط الإناث. شملت الدراسة ستة قطط إناث بالغة، حيث خضعت مجموعة واحدة لعملية كي المبيض باستخدام التخثير الكهربائي أحادي القطب، بينما تلقت المجموعة الأخرى حقنة من CaCl2. أظهرت النتائج أن تقنية الكي كانت سهلة التطبيق وآمنة، دون وجود إصابات حرارية داخل البطن ذات دلالة إحصائية، بينما أظهرت طريقة الحقن بعض المضاعفات، بما في ذلك تكوين ورم دموي. كشفت التقييمات النسيجية عن اختلافات في تلف المبيض ومستويات الهرمونات بين التقنيتين، مما يشير إلى أن كلا الطريقتين لهما مزايا وقيود في تحفيز التعقيم في القطط الإناث. [Extracted from the article]

Overpopulation of stray and unwanted cats has been a serious issue in every country and different individuals have different motivations for their spaying or neutering. The current experiment aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ovarian cauterization compared to CaCl2 injection for ovarian tissue damage in female cats. Each ovary of three cycling normal cats in reproductive age was punctured at four sites and 40 W was applied to 5 seconds at each point using monopolar electro-coagulation, resulting in 800 J (Joules) of thermal energy. Ovaries of another three cats were injected with 0.25 ml of 20% CaCl2 in 95% ethanol solution. Macroscopic and microscopic lesions were assessed depending on a number of evaluating criteria. Operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and estrogen level estimation showed significant difference between both techniques. The cauterization technique proved easy applicable and safe, and there were no intra-abdominal thermal injuries. Histologic evaluation proved essential to clarify the ovarian functional activity. Ovarian cauterization seems to be feasible and safe, and 40 W (800 J) thermal energy allowed incomplete ovarian thermal damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences is the property of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)