Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

نتائج البحث

Filter
  • 1-10 ل  34 نتائج ل ""Random covariance matrix""
Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Figure 7. Robustness of optimal receptor distribution to subsampling of odorants and receptor types. ; Robustness in the prediction is measured as the Pearson correlation between the predicted OSN numbers with complete information, and after subsampling. (a) Robustness of OSN abundances as a function of the fraction of receptors removed from the sensing matrix. Given a full sensing matrix (in this case a 24 × 110 matrix based on Drosophila data (Hallem and Carlson, 2006)), the abundances of a subset of OSN types were calculated in two ways. First, the optimization problem from Equation (7) was solved including all the OSN types and an environment with a random covariance matrix (see Figure 5). Then a second optimization problem was run in which a fraction of the OSN types were removed. The optimal neuron counts Ki′ obtained using the second method were then compared (using the Pearson correlation coefficient) against the corresponding numbers Ki from the full optimization. The shaded area in the plot shows the range between the 20th and 80th percentiles for the correlation values obtained in 10 trials, while the red curve is the mean. A new subset of receptors to be removed and a new environment covariance matrix were generated for each sample. (b) Robustness of OSN abundances as a function of the fraction of odorants removed from the environment, calculated similarly to panel a except now a certain fraction of odorants was removed from the environment covariance matrix, and from the corresponding columns of the sensing matrix.

تفاصيل العنوان

×
  • 1-10 ل  34 نتائج ل ""Random covariance matrix""