نبذة مختصرة : Submitted by Ricardo Cedraz Duque Moliterno (ricardo.moliterno@uefs.br) on 2016-09-06T22:16:58Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTA??O FINAL - AP?S DEFESA ELCI.pdf: 2234862 bytes, checksum: 49c6a6cd6ce69b00744beb523841413e (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-09-06T22:16:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTA??O FINAL - AP?S DEFESA ELCI.pdf: 2234862 bytes, checksum: 49c6a6cd6ce69b00744beb523841413e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-18
This text, written during a research developed in the Graduate Program in Education at the UnivesidadeEstadual de Feira de Santana - Bahia, aims to understandthe contribution of the Teaching Internship for pedagogic training of teachers of Higher Educationthrough the representations of students of the Community Health Master. It was certified that the curricular component Teaching Internship is an important education environment of the future university professor, locus in which students of the Graduate Program strictosensuacquire some of the knowledge needed for teaching practice. However, it is worth noting that teaching learning extends throughout one?s whole career. To achieve the established objective, we conducted a descriptive qualitative research, which was based on principles of the Social Representations Theory ? SRT (MOSCOVICI, 2003a, 2003b; JODELET, 1989, 2001 e 2007). Regarding the production of data, it was held a documentary analysis(TRIVI?OS, 1987) of the regiment and of the pedagogic proposal of the Graduate Community Health Program at UEFS. It was also used semi structured interviews (MINAYO, 2006), which were carried out with 12 students from the Academic Master of the aforementioned Program. In order to analyze the data produced in the research some principles of Content Analysis(BARDIN, 2011) were used. In the discussion of the data produced five categories were identified, as follows: the first refers to the concept of teaching internship; in the second, the knowledge necessary for university teaching is discussed; in the third was verified which were the contributions of the internship to university teaching; in the fourth the process of the Teaching Internship experience was described and, finally, in the fifth category, where suggestions to improve the experience of Teaching Internship were presented by our contributors. The main conclusions of this research focus that the internship contributes to the preparation of graduate students for university teaching and for the development of teacher identity. Moreover, it contributes to this preparation for the acquisition of knowledge of the reality of university classroom, for the exchange of knowledge with the experienced teacher and, finally, for the perception of the master students on the human condition of the teaching profession and the humanization in the relationships that occur in the educational context.In addition to these contributions, our contributors address the need for the Community Health Program not prioritizing specific studies and research training at the expense of teacher training, given the complexity of teaching today, which requires special attention.Participants also emphasized the prevalence of the following difficulties during the Teaching Internship experience: the absence of an effective interaction between the Undergraduate and Graduate programs, structural and political problems that damaged the internship. In addition to this, the students had difficulties in understanding the importance of courses in their training, didactic and pedagogical difficulties of interns to conduct the courses and embarrassments of master students to assess and deal with the graduate students taking the course again after failing. Furthermore, our study confirmed the need to implement institutional policies for the formation of the university teacher, especially with beginning teachers who are in a period of adaptation and professional learning and also with experienced teachers to reflect on their teachingpractices continuously so they can update and innovate their practices.
Este texto dissertativo, elaborado durante uma investiga??o desenvolvida no Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o da Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana ? Bahia, tem por objetivo compreender, mediante as representa??es de estudantes do Mestrado de Sa?de Coletiva, a contribui??o do Est?gio Doc?ncia para a forma??o pedag?gica de professores da Educa??o Superior. Certificamos que o componente curricular Est?gio Doc?ncia ? um importante espa?o de forma??o do futuro docente universit?rio, l?cus em que os estudantes da P?s-Gradua??o stricto sensu apreendem alguns saberes necess?rios para a pr?tica docente, entretanto ? relevante destacar que a aprendizagem da doc?ncia se estende por toda sua carreira. Para alcan?armos o objetivo tra?ado, realizamos uma pesquisa do tipo qualitativa, de car?ter descritivo, que se fundamentou em princ?pios da Teoria das Representa??es Sociais ? TRS (MOSCOVICI, 2003a, 2003b; JODELET, 1989, 2001 e 2007). Para a produ??o dos dados, realizamos an?lise documental (TRIVI?OS, 1987) do regimento e da proposta pedag?gica do Programa de P?s-Gradua??o de Sa?de Coletiva da UEFS. Tamb?m utilizamos entrevistas semiestruturadas (MINAYO, 2006), que foram realizadas com 12 estudantes desse Mestrado Acad?mico. Para a an?lise dos dados produzidos na investiga??o, utilizamos alguns princ?pios da An?lise de Conte?dos (BARDIN, 2011). No debate dos dados produzidos, identificamos cinco categorias, a saber: a primeira refere-se ao conceito de est?gio doc?ncia; na segunda, dialogamos sobre os saberes necess?rios para a doc?ncia universit?ria; a terceira, verificamos quais a/s contribui??o/?es do est?gio para a doc?ncia universit?ria; na quarta, descrevemos o processo da experi?ncia do Est?gio Doc?ncia e, finalmente, a quinta categoria, onde apresentamos as sugest?es para a melhoria da experi?ncia do Est?gio Doc?ncia, representadas por nossos colaboradores. As principais conclus?es desta pesquisa enfocam que o est?gio contribui para a prepara??o dos p?s-graduandos para a doc?ncia universit?ria, para o desenvolvimento da identidade docente, para aquisi??o de conhecimentos da realidade da sala de aula universit?ria, para a troca de saberes com o professor experiente e, por fim, para a percep??o dos mestrandos sobre a condi??o humana do profissional docente e a humaniza??o nas rela??es que ocorrem no contexto educativo. Al?m dessas contribui??es, os colaboradores da pesquisa enfocam a necessidade de o Programa de Sa?de Coletiva dar ? forma??o do professor o mesmo status que os estudos espec?ficos e a forma??o do pesquisador possuem no curr?culo, tendo em vista a complexidade da doc?ncia na atualidade.Os participantes ressaltam ainda a preval?ncia das seguintes dificuldades durante a experi?ncia do Est?gio Doc?ncia: aus?ncia de uma intera??o efetiva entre a Gradua??o e a P?s-Gradua??o, problemas estruturais e pol?ticos que prejudicaram o est?gio, dificuldades dos graduandos em compreenderem a import?ncia das disciplinas em suas forma??es, dificuldade did?tico-pedag?gica dos estagi?rios ao conduzir as disciplinas e embara?os dos mestrandos ao avaliar e lidar com os graduandos repetentes. Ademais, o estudo confirmou a necessidade da implanta??o de pol?ticas institucionais voltadas para a forma??o do professor universit?rio, especialmente os iniciantes, que est?o em per?odo de adapta??o e aprendizagem da profiss?o e, tamb?m, dos professores experientes, para que reflitam sobre suas pr?ticas de ensino continuamente, no intuito de inov?-las.
_1.png)
Processing Request
No Comments.