Discurso de ?dio sobre diferen?as de g?nero no curr?culo da p?gina Catraca Livre

Linha de pesquisa: Curr?culos, avalia??o, pr?ticas pedag?gicas e forma??o de professores. Submitted by Jos? Henrique Henrique (jose.neves@ufvjm.edu.br) on 2021-02-19T20:09:54Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) silvana_soares_silva.pdf: 1010821 bytes, checksum: 54e983e392ad85abcf9e0446710e778f (MD5) Approved for entry into archive by Jos? Henrique Henrique (jose.neves@ufvjm.edu.br) on 2021-02-22T13:39:32Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) silvana_soares_silva.pdf: 1010821 bytes, checksum: 54e983e392ad85abcf9e0446710e778f (MD5) Made available in DSpace on 2021-02-22T13:39:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) silvana_soares_silva.pdf: 1010821 bytes, checksum: 54e983e392ad85abcf9e0446710e778f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 Esta disserta??o tem como objeto de investiga??o o discurso de ?dio sobre as diferen?as de g?nero reguladas pelo padr?o heteronormativo no curr?culo do Catraca Livre, p?gina de jornalismo e entretenimento no Facebook. A pesquisa est? inserida na linha p?s-cr?tica dos estudos em curr?culo, inspirada nos Estudos Culturais e no p?s-estruturalismo. O discurso de ?dio se manifesta, por meio da corre??o, da puni??o com palavras e atos que podem ofender, machucar e matar. A pesquisa investiga a produ??o e os efeitos do discurso de ?dio nesse curr?culo ao demandar um padr?o heteronormativo ?s mulheres, l?sbicas, gays, travestis e transg?neros. Foram mapeadas publica??es sobre g?nero, que abordam os modos de ser, quest?es de g?neros divergente da norma bin?ria, direitos e liberdade das mulheres, l?sbicas, gays, travestis e transg?neros de dezembro de 2015 a dezembro de 2016. A sele??o das publica??es foi feita por meio da reitera??o do discurso de ?dio presente nas postagens e expressadas nos coment?rios. Como metodologia anal?tica utiliza-se a an?lise de discurso de inspira??o foucaultiana. O argumento central ? o de que no curr?culo analisado circulam diversos discursos, como: o religioso, o biol?gico, o machista e moralista, que d?o visibilidade e for?a ao discurso de ?dio na tentativa de normalizar os sujeitos mencionados. Os conceitos centrais que funcionaram como ferramentas anal?ticas s?o: g?nero, curr?culo, discurso, heteronormatividade, processos de subjetiva??o, poder-saber e diferen?a. Na perspectiva te?rica adotada o curr?culo ? compreendido como pr?tica de significa??o que produz saberes, estabelece pap?is, dita regras e ensina modos de ser. Entendido ainda como um artefato cultural, o curr?culo produz transforma??es e modifica??es, acionando processos de subjetiva??o em rela??es de poder desiguais. Os Estudos Culturais veem na m?dia um papel educador, abrindo espa?o para an?lises de curr?culos n?o escolares, como o aqui analisado, assim como para os estudos de g?nero. Nesta pesquisa g?nero e sexo s?o compreendidos como uma constru??o cultural a partir de uma matriz heterossexual. O g?nero ? performativo, ? resultado fluido da pr?tica reiterativa e citacional dos discursos que o nomeia. Em s?ntese, as an?lises empreendidas neste trabalho d?o destaque aos efeitos da produ??o do g?nero e do sexo ao serem nomeados, esquadrilhados e classificados pelo discurso de ?dio divulgado no curr?culo investigado. Disserta??o (Mestrado Profissional) ? Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, 2017. This work intends to investigate hate speech about gender differences ruled by heteronormative standards in the curriculum of Catraca Livre, a news and entertainment Facebook page. The research follows post-critic studies about curricula, inspired by Cultural Studies and poststructuralism. Hate speech is characterized by the intention of correcting, punishing, detracting, hurting and ultimately killing other people based on differences of various kinds. The research investigates the production and effects of hate speech in this curriculum as it demands a heteronormative standard to women, lesbians, gays, transvestites and transgender people. Posts about gender, lifestyle, non-binary gender issues, rights and freedom of women, lesbians, gays, transvestites and transgender people were selected in the period from December 2015 through December 2016. Such selection took into consideration the reiteration of hate speech in posts and comments made by the public. The analytical methodology is that of Foucault?s speech analysis. The main argument is that many other speeches are present in the analyzed curriculum, such as religious, biological, sexist and moralist, which turn hate speech visible and strong, in an attempt of normalizing the aforementioned subjects. Central concepts used as analytical tools are: gender, curriculum, speech, heteronormativity, subjectivation processes, power-knowledge and difference. According to the theoretical perspective, the curriculum is seen as a signification practice that produces knowledge, sets roles, imposes rules e teaches how one should be. Also seen as cultural artifact, the curriculum makes changes and modifications, triggering subjectivation processes in unequal power relations. The Cultural Studies consider the media a kind of educator, allowing non-academic curriculum analysis, such as the one studied here, as well as gender studies. In this work, gender and sex are understood as cultural constructs based on a heterosexual matrix. Gender is performative, it is a fluid result of reiteractive and citacional practices of the speeches which name it. In short, the analyses present in this work highlight the effects of gender and sex production as they are named, discriminated and classified by the hate speech present in the present curriculum.