Power imbalances and equity in the day-to-day functioning of a north plus multi-south higher education institutions partnership: a case study.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101147692 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1475-9276 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14759276 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Equity Health Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2002-

Schools* ; Health Education*; Humans ; Qualitative Research ; Universities ; Capacity Building

Background: Partnerships between Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the global north and south have commonly been used as a vehicle to drive global health research and initiatives. Among these initiatives, include health system strengthening, research capacity building, and human resource training in developing countries. However, the partnership functioning of many global north-south partnerships still carry legacies of colonialism through unrecognized behavior patterns, attitudes, and belief systems in how they function. Even with research literature calling for a shift from equality to equity in the functioning of these partnerships, many still struggle with issues of complex and unspoken power dynamics. To understand the successes and challenges of north-south partnerships, this paper explored partnership development and functioning of a northern and multi-southern HEIs partnership focused on nutrition education and research.
Methods: A qualitative research approach was used; data were collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs) with questions developed from the Bergen Model of Collective Functioning (BMCF). Thirteen IDIs were conducted with partners from all institutions including stakeholders.
Findings: The partnership was built on the foundation of experiences and lessons of a previous partnership. Partners used these experiences and lessons to devise strategies to improve partnership inputs, communication, leadership, roles and structures, and maintenance and communication tasks. However, these strategies had an impact on partnership functioning giving rise to issues of inequitable power dynamics. The northern partner had two roles: one as an equal partner and another as distributor of project funds; this caused a conflict in roles for this partner. The partners distinguished themselves according to partner resources - two partners were named implementing partners and two named supportive partners. Roles and partner resources were the greatest contributors to power imbalances and caused delays in project activities.
Conclusion: Using the BMCF to examine partnership dynamics illuminated that power imbalances caused a hierarchical stance in the partnership with northern partners having overall control and power of decision-making in the partnership. This could impact the effectiveness and sustainability of project in the southern institutions going forward.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)

Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Dec 23;13:81. (PMID: 26695073)
Int Dent J. 2011 Aug;61 Suppl 2:2-10. (PMID: 21770935)
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Sep 29;7(2):119-39. (PMID: 25716404)
Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1108-1120. (PMID: 29179954)
Glob Health Action. 2012;5:18369. (PMID: 22761602)
Global Health. 2012 Jun 18;8:17. (PMID: 22709651)
Acad Med. 2021 Mar 1;96(3):329-335. (PMID: 32349015)
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Dec 12;15(1):204. (PMID: 27955670)
J Public Health Policy. 2015 May;36(2):181-93. (PMID: 25568964)
Glob Health Promot. 2011 Jun;18(2):27-35. (PMID: 21596937)
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 May 5;15(1):39. (PMID: 28476127)
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Sep;28 Suppl 3:S625-38. (PMID: 23797916)
Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Mar;10(3):207-9. (PMID: 15730502)
Ann Glob Health. 2018 Apr 30;84(1):139-150. (PMID: 30873772)
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0163579. (PMID: 27737006)
Global Health. 2012 Aug 16;8:29. (PMID: 22897937)
Oncologist. 2013;18(7):783-6. (PMID: 23882020)
Hum Resour Health. 2014 May 30;12:31. (PMID: 24886267)
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 16;12(10):e0186237. (PMID: 29036174)
Med Teach. 2017 Oct;39(10):1023-1028. (PMID: 28598707)
Global Health. 2016 May 06;12(1):17. (PMID: 27154550)
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Nov 13;15(1):96. (PMID: 29132436)
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0200803. (PMID: 30235222)
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 15;17(1):41. (PMID: 30987644)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jan;94(1):5-7. (PMID: 26483123)
Ann Glob Health. 2021 Jul 12;87(1):66. (PMID: 34307069)
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Sep 25;15(1):82. (PMID: 28946911)
Health Promot Int. 2013 Mar;28(1):51-60. (PMID: 22180447)
Glob Public Health. 2016 Mar;11(3):253-275. (PMID: 25642809)
Ann Glob Health. 2016 Sep - Oct;82(5):665-677.e2. (PMID: 28283117)
Health Promot Int. 2008 Dec;23(4):365-71. (PMID: 18835888)
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 15;19(Suppl 1):49. (PMID: 29945595)
Acad Med. 2018 Dec;93(12):1760-1763. (PMID: 29727317)
Trials. 2014 Jul 05;15:267. (PMID: 24996765)
Glob Health Action. 2014 Jul 15;7:24070. (PMID: 25030216)
Can J Surg. 2020 Nov 30;63(6):E551-E561. (PMID: 33253513)
Glob Health Promot. 2016 Sep;23(3):72-81. (PMID: 25802302)
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 9;20(1):28. (PMID: 33422065)
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 15;17(1):7. (PMID: 30646902)
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Nov;57(10):1957-67. (PMID: 14499518)
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1892308. (PMID: 33704024)
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Nov;7(11):. (PMID: 36442867)
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;2(2):e0000113. (PMID: 36962146)
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):462-74. (PMID: 26584737)
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Oct;70:25-34. (PMID: 29894902)

Keywords: Equity; Health research; Higher education institutions; North-south; Partnerships; Power imbalances

Date Created: 20240316 Date Completed: 20240318 Latest Revision: 20240319

20240319

PMC10943907

10.1186/s12939-024-02139-x

38491440