Psychometric properties of a standardized protocol of muscle strength assessment by hand-held dynamometry in healthy adults: a reliability study.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968565 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2474 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712474 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2000-

Isometric Contraction*/physiology ; Muscle Strength*/physiology; Humans ; Adult ; Reproducibility of Results ; Psychometrics ; Muscle Strength Dynamometer

Background: Maximal isometric muscle strength (MIMS) assessment is a key component of physiotherapists' work. Hand-held dynamometry (HHD) is a simple and quick method to obtain quantified MIMS values that have been shown to be valid, reliable, and more responsive than manual muscle testing. However, the lack of MIMS reference values for several muscle groups in healthy adults with well-known psychometric properties limits the use and the interpretation of these measures obtained with HHD in clinic.
Objective: To determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) of MIMS torque values obtained with HHD.
Methods: Intra and Inter-rater Reliability Study. The MIMS torque of 17 muscle groups was assessed by two independent raters at three different times in 30 healthy adults using a standardized HHD protocol using the MEDup™ (Atlas Medic, Québec, Canada). Participants were excluded if they presented any of the following criteria: 1) participation in sport at a competitive level; 2) degenerative or neuromusculoskeletal disease that could affect torque measurements; 3) traumatic experience or disease in the previous years that could affect their muscle function; and 4) use of medication that could impact muscle strength (e.g., muscle relaxants, analgesics, opioids) at the time of the evaluation. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were determined using two-way mixed (intra) and random effects (inter) absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC: 95% confidence interval) models. SEM and MDC were calculated from these data.
Results: Intra- and inter-rater reliability were excellent with ICC (95% confidence interval) varying from 0.90 to 0.99 (0.85-0.99) and 0.89 to 0.99 (0.55-0.995), respectively. Absolute SEM and MDC for intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.14 to 3.20 Nm and 0.38 to 8.87 Nm, respectively, and from 0.17 to 5.80 Nm and 0.47 to 16.06 Nm for inter-rater reliability, respectively.
Conclusions: The excellent reliability obtained in this study suggest that the use of such a standardized HHD protocol is a method of choice for MIMS torque measurements in both clinical and research settings. And the identification of the now known metrological qualities of such a protocol should encourage and promote the optimal use of manual dynamometry.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)

Phys Ther Sport. 2015 May;16(2):107-13. (PMID: 25280930)
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 29;13(3):e0194531. (PMID: 29596450)
PM R. 2011 May;3(5):472-9. (PMID: 21570036)
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 19;11(10):e0165127. (PMID: 27760234)
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. (PMID: 27330520)
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 08;11(7):. (PMID: 34359313)
Phys Ther Sport. 2019 Jul;38:115-122. (PMID: 31091492)
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0140822. (PMID: 26509265)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;11(1):33-9. (PMID: 11845146)
Open Med (Wars). 2017 Oct 17;12:359-375. (PMID: 29071305)
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Mar;24(3):815-24. (PMID: 19661831)
J Biomech. 2018 Jun 25;75:171-175. (PMID: 29731325)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Dec;78(12):1364-8. (PMID: 9421992)
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2018;5(3):321-330. (PMID: 29889079)
J Athl Train. 2017 Sep;52(9):809-819. (PMID: 28787180)
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Apr 18;11:72. (PMID: 20398425)
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004 Dec;16(6):481-6. (PMID: 15739601)
IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1996 Dec;4(4):386-94. (PMID: 8973964)
J Sport Rehabil. 2008 May;17(2):160-70. (PMID: 18515915)
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Feb;11(1):3-25. (PMID: 31788969)
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2019;6(2):233-240. (PMID: 31127731)
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017 May;37(3):332-340. (PMID: 26519103)
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011 Fall;23(3):289-99. (PMID: 21829128)
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Nov;28(11):3054-3059. (PMID: 27942118)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Oct;23(10):1454-61. (PMID: 24726484)
Physiotherapy. 2016 Sep;102(3):249-55. (PMID: 26596172)
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997 Mar;29(1):49-55. (PMID: 9084106)
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Aug;23(4):487-93. (PMID: 22092308)
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jun;27(6):1799-801. (PMID: 26180324)
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2019 Sep 1;19(3):258-265. (PMID: 31475932)
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Dec 07;4(1):100172. (PMID: 35282144)
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Mar-Apr;78(2):123-30. (PMID: 10088586)
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2018;5(2):215-224. (PMID: 29865087)
Phys Ther Sport. 2016 Sep;21:75-81. (PMID: 27500450)
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):550-5. (PMID: 22773065)
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Nov 25;10(12):. (PMID: 33255648)
Percept Mot Skills. 1999 Jun;88(3 Pt 1):899-902. (PMID: 10407897)

Keywords: Hand-held dynamometry; Minimal detectable change; Muscle strength; Psychometric properties; Quantitative evaluation; Reliability; Standard error of measurement

Date Created: 20230414 Date Completed: 20230418 Latest Revision: 20230418

20231215

PMC10103411

10.1186/s12891-023-06400-2

37060020