Enjoyed by Jack but Endured by Jill: An Exploratory Case Study Examining Differences in Adolescent Design Preferences and Perceived Impacts of a Secondary Schoolyard.

Publisher: MDPI Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101238455 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1660-4601 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 16604601 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Environ Res Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: Basel : MDPI, c2004-

Students* ; Relaxation*; Humans ; Male ; Female ; Adolescent ; Schools ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Australia

The school grounds provide students opportunities for respite, relaxation and relief from daily stresses during breaks in the school day. However, it is unclear whether secondary schoolyard designs adequately support the diverse and evolving needs of adolescents, particularly at a time when they are experiencing rapid emotional and physical developmental change. To investigate this, quantitative methods were used to explore differences in perceptions of schoolyard attractiveness and restorative quality based on student gender and year level. A school-wide survey was administered to approximately 284 students in years 7 to 10 at a secondary school in Canberra, Australia. Results indicate significant declines in student perceptions of schoolyard attractiveness and restorative quality. Higher ratings of schoolyard likeability, accessibility, personal connection and restorative quality of 'being away' were associated with male students across all year levels. Further work is needed to explore how schoolyard environments can better support the design preferences and well-being needs of older and female students. Such information would help planners, designers and land managers develop schoolyard designs that are more equitable in their benefits to secondary school students of different genders and year levels.

Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):320-8. (PMID: 22898126)
Stat Methods Med Res. 1992;1(1):69-95. (PMID: 1341653)
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:207-28. (PMID: 24387090)
Health Place. 2022 Jul;76:102825. (PMID: 35636073)
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 07;14:803. (PMID: 25099142)
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):159-68. (PMID: 15694524)
Environ Res. 2022 Jun;209:112869. (PMID: 35123971)
Health Place. 2014 Jul;28:1-13. (PMID: 24691122)
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 09;11(2):e0148786. (PMID: 26859288)
J Sch Health. 2006 Dec;76(10):516-20. (PMID: 17096825)
J Phys Act Health. 2016 May;13(5):543-50. (PMID: 26529055)
Prev Med. 2007 May;44(5):398-403. (PMID: 17292958)
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Jan 26;13:100742. (PMID: 33748389)
J Sci Med Sport. 2010 Mar;13(2):210-6. (PMID: 19553158)
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Apr;56(4):522-529. (PMID: 30772148)
Health Educ Res. 2010 Apr;25(2):248-56. (PMID: 18936270)
Health Place. 2009 Jun;15(2):586-595. (PMID: 19022699)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Apr 09;8:27. (PMID: 21477325)
J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Jan;15(1):44-51. (PMID: 21940211)
Health Educ Res. 2008 Dec;23(6):952-62. (PMID: 17956885)
Behav Sci (Basel). 2014 Oct 21;4(4):394-409. (PMID: 25431444)
J Adolesc Health. 1998 May;22(5):394-402. (PMID: 9589341)

Keywords: design; high school; perception; restorative environment; schoolyard; youth

Date Created: 20230311 Date Completed: 20230314 Latest Revision: 20230418

20240104

PMC10002286

10.3390/ijerph20054221

36901232