Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Metabolic engineering for microbial production of terpenoid products

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Publication Date:
    February 18, 2025
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Patent Number:
      12227,783
    • Appl. No:
      17/729056
    • Application Filed:
      April 26, 2022
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      In various aspects and embodiments, the invention relates to bacterial strains and methods for making terpene and terpenoid products. The invention provides bacterial strains with improved carbon flux through the MEP pathway, to thereby increase terpene and/or terpenoid product yield by fermentation with carbon sources such as glucose.
    • Inventors:
      MANUS BIO INC. (Cambridge, MA, US)
    • Assignees:
      Manus Bio Inc. (Waltham, MA, US)
    • Claim:
      1. A method for production of a terpene or terpenoid, comprising: providing a bacterial strain that produces isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) through an upstream methylerythritol pathway (MEP) and converts the IPP and DMAPP to a terpene or terpenoid through a downstream synthesis pathway; and culturing the bacterial strain in culture media to produce the terpene or terpenoid, wherein greater than 15% of carbon entering glycolysis becomes MEP carbon; wherein the bacterial strain overexpresses 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase (Dxr) and 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase (IspE), such that expression levels of Dxr and IspE in the bacterial strain limits accumulation of each of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose (DOX) and 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol (ME) in the culture media to 1 g/L or less; wherein the bacterial strain further overexpresses 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-E-butenyl 4-diphosphate synthase (IspG) and 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E) 4-diphosphate reductase (IspH), such that expression levels of IspG and IspH in the bacterial cell limits accumulation of 2C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate (MEcPP) in the culture media.
    • Claim:
      2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ubiquinone biosynthesis pathway is downregulated.
    • Claim:
      3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the strain has reduced expression or activity of IspB.
    • Claim:
      4. The method of claim 3 , wherein IspB expression is reduced by a modified ribosome binding sequence (RBS).
    • Claim:
      5. The method of claim 3 , wherein a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence of the ispB gene is CGTGCT or CGTGCC or a modification thereof having one or two nucleotide changes in CGTGCT or CGTGCC.
    • Claim:
      6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the strain has an inducible or constitutive expression of the isc operon.
    • Claim:
      7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the iscR gene is deleted in whole or in part, or is inactivated, optionally by modification to an RBS.
    • Claim:
      8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the iscR gene is replaced with a inducible or constitutive promoter.
    • Claim:
      9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the strain comprises a ryhB deletion or inactivation.
    • Claim:
      10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the strain overexpresses Dxr by complementation with a recombinant gene or operon comprising dxr.
    • Claim:
      11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the strain has a modified Dxr enzyme or Dxr ortholog having increased activity with respect to the wild type E. coli Dxr.
    • Claim:
      12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the strain overexpresses IspE by complementation with a recombinant gene or operon comprising ispE.
    • Claim:
      13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the strain overexpresses ispG and ispH by complementation with a recombinant gene or operon comprising ispG and ispH.
    • Claim:
      14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the strain has a modified IspG enzyme or ortholog having increased activity with respect to the wild type E. coli IspG.
    • Claim:
      15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the IspG enzyme contains one or more mutations at positions with respect to SEQ ID NO: 5 selected from V30, S32, T34, N35, R37, V59, V61, S62, V63, L83, V84, C104, L105, P131, I132, I134, A138, K143, F176, K177, V178, V180, A182, L205, I207, A210, G212, A213, L236, V238, A241, A242, D243, R259, S262, R263, I265, N266, F267, I268, A269, T272, S274, Q276, E277, F278, D289, S301, I302, I303, V306.
    • Claim:
      16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the IspG has a modification at a plurality of positions with respect to SEQ ID NO: 5 selected from: (1) V30, S32, T34, N35, R37; or (2) V59, V61, S62, V63, L83, V84; or (3) C104, L105, S301, I302, I303, V306; or (4) P131, I132, I134, A138, K143; or (5) F176, K177, V178, V180, A182; or (6) L205, I207, A210, G212, A213; or (7) L236, V238, A241, A242, D243; or (8) R259, S262, R263, I265, N266; or (9) F267, I268, A269, T272, S274, Q276, E277, F278, D289.
    • Claim:
      17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the IspG enzyme has one, two, three or all of the following mutations with respect to SEQ ID NO: 5: L205V, A210S, G212T, and A213I.
    • Claim:
      18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the bacterial strain has at least one additional copy of dxs and idi expressed as an operon or module; or dxs, ispD, ispF, and idi expressed as an operon or module.
    • Claim:
      19. The method of claim 1 , wherein the strain is cultured with a C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, and/or C6 carbon source under microaerobic conditions.
    • Claim:
      20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the culture is at least about 100 L.
    • Claim:
      21. The method of claim 20 , comprising, monitoring the accumulation of DOX, ME, or MEcPP in the culture.
    • Claim:
      22. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, recovering the terpene or terpenoid.
    • Claim:
      23. A method for making an industrial or consumer product, comprising, incorporating the terpene or terpenoid made according to the method of claim 1 into said industrial or consumer product.
    • Claim:
      24. The method of claim 11 , wherein the strain overexpresses deoxyxylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase-like (DRL) enzyme optionally by complementation with a recombinant gene or operon comprising DRL.
    • Claim:
      25. The method of claim 1 , wherein DOX, ME, and MEcPP metabolites are found at reduced levels in the culture medium as compared to a parent strain.
    • Claim:
      26. The method of claim 25 , wherein the bacterial strain has a gene complementation of dxs, ispD, ispF, and idi genes.
    • Claim:
      27. The method of claim 1 , wherein the culture is at least 1000 L.
    • Claim:
      28. The method of claim 1 , wherein the culture is at least 10,000 L.
    • Claim:
      29. The method of claim 1 , wherein DOX and ME each accumulate in the culture at less than about 500 mg/L.
    • Claim:
      30. The method of claim 1 , wherein the bacterial strain is Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Rhodobacter capsulatus, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Zymomonas mobilis , or Pseudomonas putida.
    • Claim:
      31. The method of claim 1 , wherein the bacterial strain is Escherichia coli.
    • Patent References Cited:
      8512988 August 2013 Ajkumar et al.
      8927241 January 2015 Ajikumar et al.
      9284570 March 2016 Stephanopoulos et al.
      9359624 June 2016 Ajikumar et al.
      9404130 August 2016 Ajikumar
      9796980 October 2017 Ajikumar et al.
      9957527 May 2018 Ajikumar et al.
      10480015 November 2019 Kumaran
      10662442 May 2020 Kumaran
      11352648 June 2022 Kumaran
      2012/0107893 May 2012 Ajikumar et al.
      2014/0162337 June 2014 Chotani et al.
      2015/0044747 February 2015 Chou et al.
      2015/0152446 June 2015 Ajikumar
      2015/0225754 August 2015 Tange et al.
      1987147 July 2010
      2010/148150 December 2010
      2015/189428 December 2015
      2015189428 December 2015
      2016029153 February 2016
      2016073740 May 2016
      2017034942 March 2017
      2017142993 August 2017


























    • Other References:
      Gao et al. 2016 (Engineering the Methylerythritol Phosphate pathway in cyanobacteria for photosynthetic isoprene production from CO2; Energy and Environmental Science 9:1400-1411) (Year: 2016). cited by examiner
      Ajikumar et al. 2010 (Isoprenoid Pathway Optimization for Taxol Precursor Overproduction in Escherichia coli; Science 330: 70-74). (Year: 2010). cited by examiner
      Zhao et al. 2013 (Methylerythritol Phosphate Pathway of Isoprenoid Biosynthesis; Annu Rev Biochem 82:497-530) (Year: 2013). cited by examiner
      Li, et al., “Balanced activation of IspG and IspH to eliminate MEP intermediate accumulation and improve isoprenoids production in Escherichia coli”, Metabolic Engineering, vol. 44, Aug. 31, 2017 (Aug. 31, 2017), pp. 13-21. cited by applicant
      Zhou, et al., “Metabolite Profiling Identified Methylerythritol Cyclodiphosphate Efflux as a Limiting Step in Microbial soprenoid Production”, PLOS ONE, vol. 7, No. 11, Nov. 2, 2012 (Nov. 2, 2012), p. e47513. cited by applicant
      Puan, et al., fldA is an essential gene required in the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis, FEBS Letters, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 579, No. 17, Jul. 4, 2005 (Jul. 4, 2005), pp. 3802-3806. cited by applicant
      Withers, et al., “Identification of Isopentenol Biosynthetic Genes from Bacillus sublilis by a Screening Method Based on Isoprenoid Precursor Toxicity”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, American Society for Microbiology, US, vol. 73, No. 19, Oct. 1, 2007 (Oct. 1, 2007), pp. 6277-6283. cited by applicant
      Liu, et al, “MEP pathway mediated isopentenol production in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli”, Microbial Cell Factories, vol. 13, No. 1, Sep. 12, 2014 (Sep. 12, 2014), p. 135. cited by applicant
      Ge, et al., “Two unexpected promiscuous activities of the iron-sulfur protein IspH in production of isoprene and soamylene”, Microbial Cell Factories, vol. 15, No. 1, May 11, 2016 (May 11, 2016), pp. 1-11,. cited by applicant
      Rohmer, et al., “Isoprenoid Biosynthesis in Bacteria: A Novel Pathway for the Early Steps Eading to Isopentenyl Diphosphate”, Biochemical Journal, Published by Portland Press on Behalf of the Biochemical Society, vol. 295, No. 2, Jan. 1, 1993 (Jan. 1, 1993), pp. 517-524. cited by applicant
      Kainou, et al., “Dimer Formation of Octaprenyl-diphosphate Synthase (ispB) is Essential for Chain Length Determination of Ubiquinone”, Journal of Biological Chemistry, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, US, vol. 276, No. 11, Mar. 16, 2001 (Mar. 16, 2001), pp. 7876-7883. cited by applicant
      Lee, et al., “Biosynthesis of Isoprenoids: Crystal Structure of the [4Fe-4S] Cluster Protein IspG”, Journal of Molecular Biology, Academic Press, United Kingdom, vol. 404, No. 4, Dec. 10, 2010 (Dec. 10, 2010), pp. 600-610. cited by applicant
      Mandin, et al., “A Regulatory Circuit Composed of a Transcription Factor, IscR, and a Regulatory RNA, RyhB, Controls Fe—S Cluster Delivery.”, MBIO 20 09 2016, vol. 7, No. 5, Sep. 20, 2016. cited by applicant
      European Search Report for European Application No. EP18747944.9, dated Nov. 6, 2020, 13 pages. cited by applicant
      European Search Report for European Application No. EP18744050.8, dated Oct. 28, 2020, 13 pages. cited by applicant
      Bentley et al. “Heterologous Expression of the Mevalonic Acid Pathway in Cyanobacteria Enhances Endogenous Carbon Partitioning to Isoprene,” Molecular Plant, 2014, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 71-86. cited by applicant
      Chou et al. “Synthetic Pathway for Production of Five-Carbon Alcohols from Isopentenyl Diphosphate,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, vol. 78, No. 22, pp. 7849-7855. cited by applicant
      Intemational Search Report, for International Application No. PCT/US2018/016848, dated Apr. 23, 2018, 11 pages. cited by applicant
      Intemational Search Report, for International Application No. PCT/US2018/015527, dated May 2, 2018, 12 pages. cited by applicant
      Zhou et al. “Metabolite Profiling Identified Methylerythritol Cyclodiphosphate Efflux as a Limiting Step in Microbial Isoprenoid Production,” PloS One, 2012, vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 1-9. cited by applicant
      Morrone et al. 2010 (Increasing diterpene yield with a modular metabolic engineering system in E.coli: comparison of MEV and MEP isoprenoid precursor pathway engineering; Appl Microbial Biotechnol 85: 1893-1906). cited by applicant
      Zhao et al. 2013 (Methylerythritol Phosphate Pathway of Isoprenoid Biosynthesis; Annu Rev Biochem 82:497-530). cited by applicant
      Ajikumar et al. 2010 (Isoprenoid Pathway Optimization for Taxol Precursor Overproduction in Escherichia coli; Science 330: 70-74). cited by applicant
      Ajikumar et al. 2010 (Isoprenoid Pathway Optimization for Taxol Precursor Overproduction in Escherichia coli; Science 830: 70-74). cited by applicant
      Gao et al. 2016 (Engineering the Methylerythritol Phosphate pathway in cyanobacteria for photosynthetic isoprene production from CO2; Energy and Environmental Science 9: 1400-1411). cited by applicant
      Liu Chun-Li, et al., “Joint antisense RNA strategies for regulating isoprene production in Escheichia coli”, RSC Advances, vol. 5, No. 91, Jan. 1, 2015 (Jan. 1, 2015), pp. 74892-74898, XP093074975, DOI: 10.1039/C5RA12161B. cited by applicant
      Wang, et al., “Enhanced limonene production in cyanobacteria reveals photosynthesis limitations”, PNAS Early Edition, 2016, pp. 1-6. https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1613340113. cited by applicant
    • Primary Examiner:
      Lyons, Mary Maille
    • Attorney, Agent or Firm:
      Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edspgr.12227783