Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Can predictive justice improve the predictability and consistency of judicial decision-making?
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- المؤلفون: Bex, Floris; Prakken, Henry
- المصدر:
Schweighofer, Erich (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2021: The Thirty-Fourth Annual Conference, p.207-214. IOS Press. [ISBN 978-1-64368-252-5]
- نوع التسجيلة:
Electronic Resource
- الدخول الالكتروني :
https://research-portal.uu.nl/en/publications/2749a60e-e828-42b1-87bc-abdd695b90d9
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/415065/FAIA_346_FAIA210338.pdf?sequence=1
https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/415065/FAIA_346_FAIA210338.pdf?sequence=1
- معلومة اضافية
- Publisher Information:
IOS Press 2021
- نبذة مختصرة :
There has recently been talk of algorithms that predict decisions in legal cases being used by the judiciary to improve the predictability and consistency of judicial decision making. We argue that their use may minimise the error rate of decisions in the long run, but that this would require not only major technical advances but also major changes in legal thinking about what is the most important objective of judicial decision-making: optimising individual justice in a particular case or reducing errors in the long run. We further argue that if algorithmic decision predictors give any useful information in individual cases to judges at all, this is not in its predictions but in its explanations.
- الموضوع:
- Availability:
Open access content. Open access content
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
- Note:
DOI: 10.3233/FAIA210338
English
- Other Numbers:
QGJ oai:research-portal.uu.nl:publications/2749a60e-e828-42b1-87bc-abdd695b90d9
1445822140
- Contributing Source:
UNIVERSITEIT UTRECHT
From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative.
- الرقم المعرف:
edsoai.on1445822140
HoldingsOnline
No Comments.