Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

How are Child-Specific Utility Instruments Used in Decision Making in Australia? A Review of Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee Public Summary Documents.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Publisher Information:
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2021-11-05
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Measuring and valuing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children can be challenging but is an important component for providing decision makers with accurate information to fund new interventions, including medicines and vaccines for public subsidy. We review funding submissions of medicines made to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee contained in public summary documents to examine the use of child-specific HRQOL measures in decision making in Australia. A sample frame of medicines used by children was derived from four sources. Public summary documents relating to these medicines were searched in the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee web resources for whether they related to children (aged under 18 years) and contained HRQOL information and/or cost-utility analyses. Data about the use of utilities in decision making were extracted and analysed. Of the 1889 public summary documents available, 62 public summary documents (29 medicines) contained information pertaining to children and utilities. Of these, four public summary documents included child-specific HRQOL measures, 16 included adult HRQOL measures, 11 included direct elicitation and the HRQOL source was not defined in 31 documents. Excluding documents using child-specific HRQOL measures, we considered that in 85% of medicines, decision making uncertainty might have been reduced by using child-specific HRQOL measures. Despite the growing literature on economic analysis in paediatric populations, the use of child-specific HRQOL measures in submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee was minimal. Submissions involved inconsistent approaches, use of adult measures and weights, and substantial gaps in evidence. We recommend the consistent use of child-specific measures to improve the evidence base for decisions about medicines for children in Australia.
    • الموضوع:
    • Availability:
      Open access content. Open access content
      info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
    • Other Numbers:
      LT1 oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/151443
      Pharmacoeconomics, 2021
      1170-7690
      1179-2027
      1289935289
    • Contributing Source:
      UNIV OF TECH, SYDNEY
      From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative.
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsoai.on1289935289
HoldingsOnline