Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Evaluating Credal Set Theory as a Belief Framework in High-Level Information Fusion for Automated Decision-Making

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Karlsson, Alexander
  • نوع التسجيلة:
    Electronic Resource
  • الدخول الالكتروني :
    http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-3974
    IKI Technical Reports, ; HS-IKI-TR-08-003
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Publisher Information:
      Högskolan i Skövde, Institutionen för kommunikation och information University of Skövde 2008
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      The goal of high-level information fusion is to provide effective decision-support regarding situations, e.g., relations between events. One of the main ways that has been proposed in order to achieve this is to reduce uncertainty regarding the situation by utilizing multiple sources of information. There exist two types of uncertainty: aleatory and epistemic. Aleatory uncertainty, also known as uncertainty due to chance, cannot be reduced regardless of the amount of information. Epistemic uncertainty, on the other hand, also known as uncertainty due to lack of information, can be reduced if more information becomes available. Since the goal of high-level information fusion states that we want to reduce uncertainty by utilizing information, we conclude that the type of uncertainty referred to is epistemic in nature. Uncertainty in high-level information fusion is most often expressed via a belief framework. The most common such framework in high-level information fusion is precise Bayesian theory. In this thesis proposal we argue that precise Bayesian theory cannot adequately represent epistemic uncertainty and that there exists another befief framework referred to as credal set theory that possesses this ability. This can actually be demonstrated by such simple as tossing a coin. In precise Bayesian theory, assuming no prior information about the coin, the same probability of "Head" can be adopted as the belief before any information is available, as a prior, as well as later when a large amount of information is available, as a posterior. By utilizing credal set theory, where a credal set is defined as a closed convex set of probability measures, this case amounts to representing the prior of "Head" as a probability interval, and a posterior with a smaller interval. The idea is that when a large amount of information is available, the interval converges into a point, i.e., the length of the interval, or degree of imprecision, reflects the degree of epistemic unce
    • الموضوع:
    • Availability:
      Open access content. Open access content
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • Note:
      application/pdf
      English
    • Other Numbers:
      UPE oai:DiVA.org:his-3974
      1234074460
    • Contributing Source:
      UPPSALA UNIV LIBR
      From OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative.
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsoai.on1234074460
HoldingsOnline