Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Diagnostic performance of CMR, SPECT, and PET imaging for the detection of cardiac amyloidosis: a meta-analysis

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      BMC, 2021.
    • الموضوع:
      2021
    • Collection:
      LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Abstract Background Noninvasive myocardial imaging modalities, such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and Positron emission tomography (PET), are well-established and extensively used to detect cardiac amyloid (CA). The purpose of this study is to directly compare CMR, SPECT, and PET scans in the diagnosis of CA, and to provide evidence for further scientific research and clinical decision-making. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Studies used CMR, SPECT and/or PET for the diagnosis of CA were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) were calculated. Quality assessment of included studies was conducted. Results A total of 31 articles were identified for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities of CMR, SPECT and PET were 0.84, 0.98 and 0.78, respectively. Their respective overall specificities were 0.87, 0.92 and 0.95. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that 99mTc-HMDP manifested the highest sensitivity (0.99). 99mTc-PYP had the highest specificity (0.95). The AUC values of 99mTc-DPD, 99mTc-PYP, 99mTc-HMDP were 0.89, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively. PET scan with 11C-PIB demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.97 with an AUC value of 0.98. Conclusion Our meta-analysis reveals that SEPCT scans present better diagnostic performance for the identification of CA as compared with other two modalities.
    • File Description:
      electronic resource
    • ISSN:
      1471-2261
    • Relation:
      https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2261
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s12872-021-02292-z
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsdoj.bef6a69eccb54b178da9d740ba750d83