Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Glenoid lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: metal vs. bone offset in different implant designs

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      Elsevier, 2024.
    • الموضوع:
      2024
    • Collection:
      LCC:Orthopedic surgery
      LCC:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Higher bone or metal glenoid offset in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) reduces scapular notching, improves range of motion (ROM), and reduces postoperative instability. This retrospective multicenter study compared two implant designs to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiologic results of bone increased offset RSA (BIO-RSA) and metal increased offset RSA (MIO-RSA) in reverse shoulder. We hypothesized no difference between groups. Methods: This study analyzed n = 62 BIO-RSA and n = 90 MIO-RSA cases with a mean follow-up of 29.7 ± 6.0 months (BIO-RSA, range 24-49 months) and 24.0 ± 1.1 months (MIO-RSA, range 22-28 months). A 145°-onlay humeral stem was utilized in BIO-RSA cases, while a 135°-semi-inlay humeral stem was implanted in all MIO-RSA cases. Preoperative and postoperative radiologic imaging was reviewed to identify signs of scapular notching. Additionally, lateralization was evaluated according to Erickson et al. The constant score, subjective shoulder value, and ROM were evaluated during the baseline and follow-up consultations, and the findings of both groups were subsequently compared. Results: Scapular notching was observed in 7.0% (n = 8) of MIO-RSA cases and 8.1% (n = 5) of BIO-RSA cases (P = .801). MIO-group had a higher lateralization angle (P = .020) and the BIO-group had a higher distalization angle (P = .005). At baseline, mean constant score in the MIO-RSA group was higher than in the BIO-RSA group (P
    • File Description:
      electronic resource
    • ISSN:
      2666-6383
    • Relation:
      http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324000665; https://doaj.org/toc/2666-6383
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1016/j.jseint.2024.02.006
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsdoj.be5cb3b3ed914210913666aafeda7af2