نبذة مختصرة : Previous research has shown that programmatic factors influence doctoral student outcomes, including timelines. However, completely online doctoral students have unique characteristics and needs and are underrepresented in the research literature; therefore, research exploring programmatic factors as related to learning outcomes in this population is warranted. This study investigated differences in time to completion among 3 cohorts of non-clinical psychology doctoral students: those who experienced a traditional dissertation model, those who experienced a sequentially structured dissertation model, and a transition cohort. We used institutional data from a non-profit completely online primarily doctoral-granting university for 430 doctoral students who completed their psychology PhD from 2013-2020. Analyses indicated time to completion was significantly lower for the sequentially structured cohort compared to the traditional (p < .001, d = .70) and transition cohorts (p < .01, d = .43). There was no statistically significant difference between the traditional and transition cohorts (p = .09). Overall, these results suggest mechanisms of the sequentially structured model support conscientious student progress with structured proximal goals and mentor feedback loops to guide progress and support timely completion.
No Comments.