Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Ethical Challenges of Medicine and Health on the Internet: A Review

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      Gunther Eysenbach; Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Toronto, Canada
    • الموضوع:
      2003
    • Collection:
      University of Toronto: Research Repository T-Space
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Reviewer: Goodman, KW ; Reviewer: Rodrigues, R ; Reviewer: Risk, A ; Reviewer: Mack, J ; [This item is a preserved copy and is not necessarily the most recent version. To view the current item, visit http://www.jmir.org/2001/2/e23/ ] Knowledge and capabilities, particularly of a new technology or in a new area of study, frequently develop faster than the guidelines and principles needed for practitioners to practice ethically in the new arena; this is particularly true in medicine. The blending of medicine and healthcare with e-commerce and the Internet raises many questions involving what sort of ethical conduct should be expected by practitioners and developers of the medical Internet. Some of the early pioneers in medical and healthcare Web sites pushed the ethical boundaries with questionable, even unethical, practices. Many involved with the medical Internet are now working to reestablish patient and consumer trust by establishing guidelines to determine how the fundamentals of the medical code of ethical conduct can best be adapted for the medical/healthcare Internet. Ultimately, all those involved in the creation, maintenance, and marketing of medical and healthcare Web sites should be required to adhere to a strict code of ethical conduct, one that has been fairly determined by an impartial international organization with reasonable power to regulate the code. This code could also serve as a desirable, recognizable label-of-distinction for ethical Web sites within the medical and healthcare Internet community. One challenge for those involved with the medical and healthcare Internet will be to determine what constitutes "Medical Internet Ethics" or "Healthcare Internet Ethics," since the definition of medical ethics can vary from country to country. Therefore, the emerging field of Medical/ Healthcare Internet Ethics will require careful thought and insights from an international collection of ethicists in many contributing areas. This paper is a review of the current status of the evolving field of ...
    • File Description:
      117154 bytes; 182740 bytes; 67822 bytes; 195584 bytes; 125 bytes; 6817 bytes; text/html; text/xml; image/jpeg; application/vnd.ms-powerpoint; image/gif; application/octet-stream
    • ISSN:
      1438-8871
    • Relation:
      Charles S C, Lazarus J A. Reframing the professional ethic: the Council of Medical Specialty Societies consensus statement on the ethic of medicine. West J Med Sep 2000. Vol. 173(3) p. 198-201. URL: http://www.ewjm.com/cgi/content/full/173/3/198; Kassirer J P. Pseudoaccountability. Ann Intern Med Apr 3, 2001. Vol. 134(7) p. 587-90. URL: http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=reprint&pmid=11281741; US Department of Commerce. The emerging digital economy, Chap 1: The digital revolution. Apr 1998. URL: http://www.ecommerce.gov/emerging.htm [accessed 2001 Apr 17]; Nua Internet Surveys. How many online?. Nov 2000. URL: http://www.nua.ie/surveys/how_many_online/index.html [accessed 2001 Apr 17]; Guadagnino C. Using medical information on the Internet. Physician's News Digest Jul 2000. URL: http://www.physiciansnews.com/spotlight/700.html [accessed 2001 Apr 17]; The Pew Internet and American Life Project. The online health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves, Summary of findings: The Internet's powerful influence on "health seekers.". Nov 26, 2000. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=26 [accessed 2001 Jun 24]; Cyber Dialogue. Online health information seekers growing twice as fast as online population [press release]. May 23, 2000. URL: http://www.cyberdialogue.com/news/releases/2000/05-23-cch-future.html [accessed 2001 Apr 17]; Goldman J, Hudson Z, Smith RM. Privacy: Report on the privacy policies and practices of health Web sites. California HealthCare Foundation Jan 2000. URL: http://ehealth.chcf.org/view.cfm?section=Privacy&itemID=1750 [accessed 2001 Apr 18]; Medem Inc. eRisk for providers: Understanding and mitigating provider risk associated with online patient interaction. Mar 2001. URL: http://www.medem.com/erisk [accessed 2001 Apr 13]; Childress C A. Ethical issues in providing online psychotherapeutic interventions. J Med Internet Res Mar 31, 2000. Vol. 2(1) p. e5. URL: http://www.jmir.org/2000/1/e5/; Halvorsen J G. Professionalism reconsidered. Priorities for physicians. Arch Fam Med Apr 1999. Vol. 8(2) p. 173-6. URL: http://archfami.ama-assn.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10101990; American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations 2002-2003 American Medical Association; Chicago, IL. Jul 15, 2002. p. 105.; Crawshaw R, Rogers D E, Pellegrino E D, Bulger R J, Lundberg G D, Bristow L R, Cassel C K, Barondess J A. Patient-physician covenant. JAMA May 17, 1995. Vol. 273(19) p. 1553.; Winker M A, Flanagin A, Chi-lum B, White J, Andrews K, Kennett R L, Deangelis C D, Musacchio R A. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association. JAMA 2000. Vol. 283(12) p. 1600-6. URL: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/1905.html; Goodman KW, Miller RA. Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE, editors. Ethics and Health Informatics: Users, Standards, and Outcomes. Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine Springer-Verlag; New York. 2000. p. Chap. 7.; Internet Healthcare Coalition. New Survey shows disparity between Web developers and consumers over Health Internet [press release]. Oct 4, 2000. URL: http://www.ihealthcoalition.org/about/ihc_pr8.html [accessed 2001 Apr 17]; Goodman K. Goodman K, editors. Bioethics and Health Informatics: An Introduction. Ethics, Computing, and Medicine Cambridge University Press; Cambridge. Jan 15, 1998. p. 1-31.; Ruddick W. Becker Lawrence C, Becker Charlotte B, editors. Medical Ethics. Encyclopedia of Ethics Garland Publishing. 1998. URL: http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/ruddick/papers/medethics.html [accessed 2001 Feb 12]; Maheu MM. Delivering Behavioral Telehealth via the Internet: eHealth. Feb 1, 2000. URL: http://telehealth.net/articles/deliver.html [accessed 2001 Jun 17]; Merriam Websters. Websters Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary Merriam-webster+ Inc; Springfield, Mass. 1984.; Lundberg GD. The Ethics of the Medical Internet: Medscape's Advertising Policy. MedGenMed Sep 10, 1999. p. e25. URL: http://www.medscape.com/Medscape/GeneralMedicine/journal/1999/v01.n09/mgm0910.lund/mgm0910.lund.html; Foubister V. Developing rules for the Web. American Medical News. Jul 31, 2000. Vol. 43 p. 11-12. URL: http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_00/prsa0731.htm [accessed 2001 Mar 9]; Rotblat J. A Hippocratic Oath for scientists. Science Nov 19, 1999. Vol. 286(5444) p. 1475. URL: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=summary&pmid=10610545; American Association for the Advancement of Science. Science and society, To pledge or not to ledge: An oath for scientists?. Feb 19, 2001. URL: http://www.aaas.org/meetings/2001/6048.00.htm [accessed 2001 February 17]; Student Pugwash USA. About the pledge. Sep 22, 2000. URL: http://www.igc.org/pugwash/pledge [accessed 2001 Mar 1]; Albery N. Hippocratic Oath for Scientists. URL: http://www.globalideasbank.org/BOV/BV-381.HTML [accessed 2001 Mar 1]; Jargon File 4.2.3. Cracker definition. Nov 23, 2000. URL: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/cracker.html [accessed 2001 Apr 29]; Jargon File 4.2.3. Hacker definition. Nov 23, 2000. URL: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/hacker.html [accessed 2001 Apl 29]; Jargon File 4.2.3. Virus definition. Nov 23, 2000. URL: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/virus.html [accessed 2001 Apr 29]; Jargon File 4.2.3. Worm definition. Nov 23, . URL: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/worm.html [accessed 2001 Apr 29]; California Department of Consumer Affairs. 1998 Legislative Digest SB 1379. Invasion of Privacy: Paparazzi (Civ C SECT 1708.8) URL: http://www.dca.ca.gov/legis/sb1379.htm [accessed 2001 Apr 29]; California Department of Consumer Affairs. 1998 Legislative Digest SB 1796. Stalking: Cyberstalking (Civ C SECT 1708.7 and Pen C SECT 422, 646.9 & 653) URL: http://www.dca.ca.gov/legis/sb1796.htm [accessed 2001 Apr 29]; Internet Fraud Complaint Center (IFCC). URL: https://www.ifccfbi.gov/ [accessed 2001 May 14]; Federal Trade Commission. URL: http://www.ftc.gov [accessed 2001 May 14]; Federal Trade Commission. "Operation Cure.All" wages new battle in ongoing war against Internet health fraud [press release]. Jun 14, 2001. URL: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2001/06/cureall.htm [accessed 2001 Jun 19]; Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) of the Criminal Division of the US Department of Justice. URL: http://www.cybercrime.gov/ [accessed 2001 Mar 4]; California HealthCare Foundation. Ethics survey of consumer attitudes about health Web sites. Conducted by Cyber Dialogue and the Institute for the Future. Sep 2000. URL: http://ehealth.chcf.org/view.cfm?section=Consumer&itemID=1740 [accessed 2001 Jun 24]; Galewitz P. 858 Kaiser e-mails go to wrong patients. Contra Costa Times Aug 10, 2000.; Chin T. Security breach: Hacker gets medical records. American Medical News Jan 29, 2001. URL: http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_01/tesa0129.htm [accessed 2001 Mar 4]; Computer Security Institute. Financial losses due to Internet intrusions, trade secret theft and other cyber crimes soar. Mar 12, 2001. URL: http://www.gocsi.com/prelea_000321.htm [accessed 2001 Mar 12]; Eysenbach G. Report of a case of cyberplagiarism--and reflections on detecting and preventing academic misconduct using the Internet. J Med Internet Res Mar 31, 2000. Vol. 2(1) p. e4. URL: http://www.jmir.org/2000/1/e4/; US Copyright Office, Library of Congress. Copyright basics. Dec 2000. URL: http://www.loc.gov/copyright/circs/circ1.html [accessed 2001 May 10]; Brinson JD, Radcliffe MF. Multimedia law and business handbook. Chap 2: Copyright Law. URL: http://www.laderapress.com/laderapress/copyrightlaw1.html [accessed 2001 May 4]; MIT. MIT to make nearly all course materials available free on the World Wide Web: Unprecedented step challenges 'privatization of knowledge' [press release]. Apr 4, 2001. URL: http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/ocw.html [accessed 2001 Apr 10]; Supercourse: Epidemiology, the Internet and global health. Apr 1, 2000. URL: http://www.pitt.edu/~super1 [accessed 2001 May 5]; Dyer K, Thompson C. Medical Internet ethics: A field in evolution. Medinfo 2001.; Noble H. Noble H, Hailed as a Surgeon General, Koop is faulted on Web ethics. NewYork Times Sep 5, 1999.; Seeman M V. E-psychiatry: the patient-psychiatrist relationship in the electronic age. CMAJ Nov 2, 1999. Vol. 161(9) p. 1147-9. URL: http://www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-161/issue-9/1147.htm; ISMHO/PSI (International Society for Mental Health Online/Psychiatric Society for Informatics). Suggested principles for the online provision of mental health services [version 3.11]. Jan 9, 2000. URL: http://www.ismho.org/suggestions.html [accessed 2001 Mar 4]; National Board for Certified Counselors, Inc. Standards for the ethical practice of WebCounseling. Sep 30, 1999. URL: http://www.nbcc.org/ethics/wcstandards.htm [accessed 2001 Mar 4]; Gerber B S, Eiser A R. The patient physician relationship in the Internet age: future prospects and the research agenda. J Med Internet Res Apr 9, 2001. Vol. 3(2) p. e15. URL: http://www.jmir.org/2001/2/e15/; Spielberg A R. On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA Oct 21, 1998. Vol. 280(15) p. 1353-9.; Eysenbach G. Consumer health informatics. BMJ Jun 24, 2000. Vol. 320(7251) p. 1713-6. URL: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/320/7251/1713; Suler J. Ethics in cyberspace research: Consent, privacy and contribution. Psychology of cyberspace Feb 2000. URL: http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/ethics.html [accessed 2001 March 9]; CancerNet. Help: LiveHelp Cancer.gov. URL: http://cancernet.nci.nih.gov/help.html#LH [accessed 2001 May 12]; Roberts P. Protecting the participant in the contested private/public terrain of Internet research: Can computer ethics make a difference?. URL: http://www.aice.swin.edu.au/events/AICE2000/papers/rob.pdf [accessed 2001 Mar 11]; Ethics Committee of the American Psychological Association. APA statement on services by telephone, teleconferencing, and Internet. Nov 5, 1997. URL: http://www.apa.org/ethics/stmnt01.html [accessed 2001 May 3]; American Medical Informatics Association. Clinical trials working group. URL: http://www.amia.org/working/ct.html [accessed 2001 Mar 9]; American Medical Informatics Association. Ethical, legal, and social issues working group. URL: http://www.amia.org/working/elsi.html [accessed 2001 Mar 9]; Price S L, Hersh W R. Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Symp 1999. p. 911-5. URL: http://www.amia.org/pubs/symposia/D005524.PDF; Baur C, Deering M J. Proposed frameworks to improve the quality of health web sites: review. MedGenMed Sep 26, 2000. Vol. 2(3) p. e35. URL: http://www.medscape.com/Medscape/GeneralMedicine/journal/2000/v02.n05/mgm0926.baur/mgm0926.baur-01.html; Health on the Net Foundation (HON). HON code of conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites: Principles. URL: http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html [accessed 2001 March 5]; British Healthcare Internet Association. Quality standards for medical publishing on the Web. 1996. URL: http://bhia.org/reference/documents/recommend_webquality.htm [accessed 2001 May 5]; British Healthcare Internet Association. A Bill of Rights for the Internet. 1997. URL: http://bhia.org/reference/documents/press_19971107.htm [accessed 2001 May 5]; Silberg W M, Lundberg G D, Musacchio R A. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA Apr 16, 1997. Vol. 277(15) p. 1244-5.; Society of Professional Journalists. Society of Professional Journalists, Code of Ethics. Sep 1996. URL: http://spj.org/ethics [accessed 2001 May 5]; American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA). AHIMA's recommendations to ensure privacy and quality of personal health information on the Internet. Aug 2000. URL: http://www.ahima.org/infocenter/guidelines/tenets.html [accessed 2001 May 5]; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Policies for posting biomedical journal information on the Internet. May 2000. URL: http://www.icmje.org/index.html#internet [accessed 2001 May 13]; Health Summit Working Group. Information quality tool. Jun 23, 2000. URL: http://HitiWeb.mitretek.org/iq/default.asp [accessed 2001 May 5]; DISCERN. URL: http://www.discern.org.uk [accessed 2001 May 5]; The quality information checklist. May 15, 2000. URL: http://www.quick.org.uk [accessed 2001 May 5]; New York Online Access to Health (NOAH). URL: http://www.noah-health.org [accessed 2001 May 5]; Robert W. Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library of Emory University. MedWeb URL: http://www.medweb.emory.edu/MedWeb [accessed 2001 May 5]; Netwellness University of Cincinnati. URL: http://www.netwellness.org [accessed 2001 May 5]; InteliHealth. Harvard Medical School's consumer health information. URL: http://www.intelihealth.com [accessed 2001 May 5]; Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Mayoclinic.com. URL: http://www.mayohealth.org [accessed 2001 May 5]; Medical Matrix L.L.C. Medical matrix. URL: http://www.medmatrix.org/index.asp [accessed 2001 May 5]; URAC (American Accreditation HealthCare Commission. Answers to frequently asked questions: What is the cost of accreditation?. URL: http://www.urac.org/webfaq.htm [accessed 2001 Jun 19]; URAC (American Accreditation HealthCare Commission). URAC and Hi-Ethics collaborate on health Web site accreditation [press release]. May 21, 2001. URL: http://www.urac.org/010521Hi-EthicsURAC.htm [accessed 2001 Jun 19]; Eysenbach G, Yihune G, Lampe K, Cross P, Brickley D. MedCERTAIN: quality management, certification and rating of health information on the Net. Proc AMIA Symp 2000. p. 230-4. URL: http://www.amia.org/pubs/symposia/D200285.PDF; Sherrid P. What's up, Dr. Koop? The health care Web site comes under fire. U.S. News. Sep 20, 1999. URL: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/990920/koop.htm [accessed 2001 May 5]; The Associated Press. Sealing the cookie jar: Citing privacy, drkoop.com ditches cookies. Feb 12, 2000. URL: http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/DailyNews/drkoop000212.html [accessed 2001 May 5]; Calacanis C. Drkoop.com's troubles continue: Class-action suits abound. IhealthcareWeekly.com Aug 8, 2000. URL: http://www.ihealthcareweekly.com/issues/ihcw08082000.html [accessed 2001 Mar 5]; Rippen H, Risk A. for the e-Health Ethics Initiative. e-Health Code of Ethics. J Med Internet Res 2000. Vol. 2(2) p. e9. URL: http://www.jmir.org/2000/2/e9/ [accessed 2001 May 5]; MedCERTAIN. Consensus workshop, Quality criteria for health related websites: A foundation for rating and filtering health information. Aug 2, 2000. URL: http://www.medcertain.org/English/About_us/Consensus_Workshop/consensus_workshop.htm [accessed 2001 May 5]; Hi-Ethics, Inc. Health Internet ethics: Ethical principles for offering Internet health services to consumers. URL: http://www.hiethics.org/Principles/index.asp [accessed 2001 Mar 5]; Hi-Ethics, Inc. Hi-Ethics releases ethical principles for the health Internet: top health Web sites agree on rules to earn public trust. May 7, 2000. URL: http://www.hiethics.org/Press/Releases/000507.asp [accessed 2001 May 5]; Jadad A R, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?. JAMA Feb 25, 1998. Vol. 279(8) p. 611-4.; Department of Health and Human Services. Remarks by the President on medical privacy [press release]. Dec 20, 2000. URL: http://www.hipaadvisory.com/news/clinton1220.htm [accessed 2001 Mar 4]; Dillon N. Web should prepare for a non-English majority. Jun 14, 1999. URL: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9906/14/nonenglish.idg [accessed 2001 Jun 15]; Rodrigues RJ. Ethical and Legal Issues in Interactive Health Communications: A Call for International Cooperation. J Med Internet Res 2000. Vol. 2(1) p. e8. URL: http://www.jmir.org/2000/1/e8/; ebXML Website. URL: http://www.ebxml.org [accessed 2001 May 12]; Medicine, Ethics, & Medical Informatics. URL: http://www.kirstimd.com/MINF_528 [accessed 2001 June 24]; Kirsti A Dyer. Ethical Challenges of Medicine and Health on the Internet: A Review. J Med Internet Res 2001;3(2):e23; http://hdl.handle.net/1807/4618
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.2196/jmir.3.2.e23
    • Rights:
      Copyright (cc) Retained by author(s) under a Creative Commons License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.F768D016