Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Evaluation of the reduction, tightening and gripping performance of an innovative set screw technology for instrumented posterior lumbar fusion: A biomechanical study

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Rio Hortega University Hospital (Hospital Universitario Río Hortega) Valladolid, Spain (RHUH); Institut du Cerveau = Paris Brain Institute (ICM); Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière AP-HP; Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
    • بيانات النشر:
      HAL CCSD
      Elsevier
    • الموضوع:
      2021
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      International audience ; Background: Instrumented posterior lumbar fusion with top-loading pedicle screw systems (PSS) requires fully tightened set screws to achieve a secure fixation and symmetric load condition. This assumes a complete reduction of the rod by 90°, which is not always attainable in situ, especially under constraint. The objective of this work is to compare the mechanical performance of different innovative set screw technologies, which should improve the tightening process. Hypothesis: The hypotheses of the study are that modifications to the screw and screwdriver unit can (1) improve the quality of set screw tightening and (2) increase the axial gripping capacity of the construct. Materials and methods: The four set screw technologies under investigation include a standard set screw with a flat surface (F-S; control group), a set screw with a convex surface (C-S) and a shaft tip method screwdriver used in combination with both flat (F-STM) and convex set screws (C-STM). The quality of set screw tightening is categorized as follows: failed=the rod is not completely reduced; reduced=the rod is successfully reduced but the set screw is not correctly fixed; good=remaining cases. An axial gripping capacity test is performed by a universal testing machine (Instron®) with a force capacity of 5kN. Results: Regarding the quality of set screw tightening, comparisons between F-S vs. F-STM, F-S vs. C-STM and between C-S vs. C-STM show statistically significant differences (p<0.001). The axial gripping capacity test shows mean gripping forces of 1223N (STD 331) in the F-STM group and of 1724N (STD 168) in the C-STM group with statistically significant differences between both groups (p=0.003). Discussion: Several biomechanical and clinical case studies have identified possible effects of misaligned rod-screw interfaces such as screw pull-out during rod reduction, screw loosening, screw or rod breakage, misalignment, adjacent segment degeneration and worsening of the clinical outcome. C-STM-technology ...
    • Relation:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/33812093; hal-04541306; https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-04541306; https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-04541306/document; https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-04541306/file/1-s2.0-S1877056821001377-main.pdf; PUBMED: 33812093
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102918
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.DAA1F813