Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Clinical outcomes of extracranial carotid artery-related stroke eligible for mechanical reperfusion on top of per-guidelines thrombolytic therapy : analysis from a 6-month consecutive patient sample in 2 centers

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • الموضوع:
      2022
    • Collection:
      Jagiellonian University Repository
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      BACKGROUND: Systemic intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are guideline-recommended reperfusion therapies in large-vessel-occlusion ischemic stroke. However, for acute ischemic stroke of extracranial carotid artery origin (AIS-CA) there have been no specific trials, resulting in a data gap. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated referral/treatment pathways, serial imaging, and neurologic 90-day outcomes in consecutive patients, presenting in a real-life series in 2 stroke centers over a period of 6 months, with AIS-CA eligible for emergency mechanical reperfusion (EMR) on top of thrombolysis as per guideline criteria. RESULTS: Of 30 EMR-eligible patients (33.3% in-window for thrombolysis and thrombolysed, 73.3% male, age 39-87 years, median Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) 10, pre-stroke mRS 0-1 in all, tandem lesions 26.7%), 20 (66.7%) were EMR-referred (60% – endovascular, 6.7% – surgery referrals). Only 40% received EMR, nearly exclusively in stroke centers with carotid artery stenting (CAS) expertise (100% eligible patient acceptance rate, 100% treatment delivery involving CAS±MT with culprit lesion sequestration using micronet-covered stents). The emergency surgery rate was 0%. Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics did not differ between EMR-treated and EMR-untreated patients. Ninety-day neurologic status was profoundly better in EMR-treated patients: mRS 0-2 (91.7% vs 0%; P<0.001); mRS 3-5 (8.3% vs 88.9%; P<0.001), mRS 6 (0% vs 11.1%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life AIS-CA setting, the referral rate of EMR-eligible patients for EMR was low, and the treatment rate was even lower. AIS-CA revascularization was delivered predominantly in stroke thrombectomy-capable cardioangiology centers, resulting in overwhelmingly superior patient outcome. Large vessel occlusion stroke referral and management pathways should involve centers with proximal-protected CAS expertise. AIS-CA, irrespective of any thrombolysis administration, is a hyperacute ...
    • Relation:
      Medical Science Monitor, T. 28; https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/306150; https://medscimonit.com/abstract/full/idArt/938549
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.12659/MSM.938549
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/306150
      https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.938549
      https://medscimonit.com/abstract/full/idArt/938549
    • Rights:
      Udzielam licencji. Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowa ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.pl
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.D3EEB5AF