Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

How equitable is health spending on curative services and institutional delivery in Malawi? Evidence from a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH); University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty; Centre population et développement (CEPED - UMR_D 196); Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité); Pôle de recherche pour l'organisation et la diffusion de l'information géographique (PRODIG (UMR_8586 / UMR_D_215 / UM_115)); Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-AgroParisTech-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité); University of Malawi
    • بيانات النشر:
      HAL CCSD
      BioMed Central
    • الموضوع:
      2022
    • Collection:
      Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne: HAL
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      International audience ; BackgroundMalawi is one of a handful of countries that had resisted the implementation of user fees, showing a commitment to providing free healthcare to its population even before the concept of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) acquired global popularity. Several evaluations have investigated the effects of key policies, such as the essential health package or performance-based financing, in sustaining and expanding access to quality health services in the country. Understanding the distributional impact of health spending over time due to these policies has received limited attention. Our study fills this knowledge gap by assessing the distributional incidence of public and overall health spending between 2004 and 2016.MethodsWe relied on a Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA) to measure the socioeconomic inequality of public and overall health spending on curative services and institutional delivery across different health facility typologies. We used data from household surveys and National Health Accounts. We used a concentration index (CI) to determine the health benefits accrued by each socioeconomic group.ResultsSocioeconomic inequality in both public and overall health spending substantially decreased over time, with higher inequality observed in overall spending, non-public health facilities, curative health services, and at higher levels of care. Between 2004 and 2016, the inequality in public spending on curative services decreased from a CI of 0.037 (SE 0.013) to a CI of 0.004 (SE 0.011). Whiles, it decreased from a CI of 0.084 (SE 0.014) to a CI of 0.068 (SE 0.015) for overall spending in the same period. For institutional delivery, inequality in public and overall spending decreased between 2004 and 2016 from a CI of 0.032 (SE 0.028) to a CI of -0.057 (SE 0.014) and from a CI of 0.036 (SE 0.022) to a CI of 0.028 (SE 0.018), respectively.ConclusionsThrough its free healthcare policy, Malawi has reduced socioeconomic inequality in health spending over time, but some challenges ...
    • Relation:
      hal-03824699; https://hal.science/hal-03824699; https://hal.science/hal-03824699/document; https://hal.science/hal-03824699/file/s12939-022-01624-5.pdf; IRD: fdi:010084356
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s12939-022-01624-5
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://hal.science/hal-03824699
      https://hal.science/hal-03824699/document
      https://hal.science/hal-03824699/file/s12939-022-01624-5.pdf
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01624-5
    • Rights:
      http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ ; info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.D054A21E