Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Comparative Effectiveness of Adalimumab vs Tofacitinib in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Australia.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      American Medical Association (AMA)
      Mrc Biostatistics Unit
      //dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20851
      JAMA Netw Open
    • الموضوع:
      2023
    • Collection:
      Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      IMPORTANCE: There is a need for observational studies to supplement evidence from clinical trials, and the target trial emulation (TTE) framework can help avoid biases that can be introduced when treatments are compared crudely using observational data by applying design principles for randomized clinical trials. Adalimumab (ADA) and tofacitinib (TOF) were shown to be equivalent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a randomized clinical trial, but to our knowledge, these drugs have not been compared head-to-head using routinely collected clinical data and the TTE framework. OBJECTIVE: To emulate a randomized clinical trial comparing ADA vs TOF in patients with RA who were new users of a biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative effectiveness study emulating a randomized clinical trial of ADA vs TOF included Australian adults aged 18 years or older with RA in the Optimising Patient Outcomes in Australian Rheumatology (OPAL) data set. Patients were included if they initiated ADA or TOF between October 1, 2015, and April 1, 2021; were new b/tsDMARD users; and had at least 1 component of the disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) recorded at baseline or during follow-up. INTERVENTION: Treatment with either ADA (40 mg every 14 days) or TOF (10 mg daily). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was the estimated average treatment effect, defined as the difference in mean DAS28-CRP among patients receiving TOF compared with those receiving ADA at 3 and 9 months after initiating treatment. Missing DAS28-CRP data were multiply imputed. Stable balancing weights were used to account for nonrandomized treatment assignment. RESULTS: A total of 842 patients were identified, including 569 treated with ADA (387 [68.0%] female; median age, 56 years [IQR, 47-66 years]) and 273 treated with TOF (201 [73.6%] female; median age, 59 years [IQR, 51-68 years]). After applying stable balancing ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/353480
    • Rights:
      Attribution 4.0 International ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.CEBCBB23