Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations ; a scoping review

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC); Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) - Pólo ENSP; Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP)
    • الموضوع:
      2023
    • Collection:
      Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Funding Information: The present publication was funded by Fundação Ciência e Tecnologia, IP national support through CHRC (UIDP/04923/2020) and under the grant (UI/BD/150875/2021). Funding Information: This work was supported by ERNST–Cost Action 19113 (COST–European Cooperation in Science and Technology, www.cost.eu). We would like to particularly thank the members of stakeholder groups, namely Prof. Reinhard Strametz, Dr Susanna Tella and Professor Massimiliano Panella, for their contribution to this study as members of the consultation group. Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. ; Objectives This study aims to map and frame the main factors present in support interventions successfully implemented in health organisations in order to provide timely and adequate response to healthcare workers (HCWs) after patient safety incidents (PSIs). Design Scoping review guided by the six-stage approach proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and by PRISMA-ScR. Data sources CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, PubMed, SciELO Citation Index, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, reference lists of the eligible articles, websites and a consultation group. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Empirical studies (original articles) were prioritised. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Version 2018 to conduct a quality assessment of the eligible studies. Data extraction and synthesis A total of 9766 records were retrieved (last update in November 2022). We assessed 156 articles for eligibility in the full-text screening. Of these, 29 earticles met the eligibility criteria. The articles were independently screened by two authors. In the case of disagreement, a third author was involved. The collected data were organised according to the Organisational factors, People, Environment, Recommendations from other Audies, Attributes of the support interventions. We used EndNote to import articles from the databases and Rayyan to support ...
    • ISSN:
      2044-6055
    • Relation:
      PURE: 84867964; PURE UUID: 07c3f101-dbf3-4a2a-8b78-18c50d19d531; Scopus: 85181395584; PubMed: 38151271; ORCID: /0000-0001-9502-6075/work/156014904; WOS: 001134943800073; PubMedCentral: PMC10753749; http://hdl.handle.net/10362/167129; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078118
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078118
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      http://hdl.handle.net/10362/167129
      https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078118
    • Rights:
      openAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.C6D2F38