بيانات النشر: Linköpings universitet, Handikappvetenskap
Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten
Linköpings universitet, Institutet för handikappvetenskap (IHV)
ESMT Berlin, Germany
Univ Zurich, Switzerland
Tilburg Univ, Netherlands
Tilburg Univ, Netherlands; Univ Utrecht, Netherlands
Univ Washington, WA 98195 USA
ESMT Berlin, Germany; Indiana Univ, IN USA
ESMT Berlin, Germany; Humboldt Univ, Germany
INSEAD, France
Univ Southern Calif, CA 90007 USA
Imperial Coll Business Sch, England
Indian Sch Business, India
Univ Sussex, England
Univ Haifa, Israel
INSEAD, Singapore
Waseda Univ, Japan
Stockholm Sch Econ, Sweden
Katholieke Univ Leuven, Belgium
IBM Corp, Germany
Wake Forest Univ, NC 27101 USA
Univ Texas Austin, TX 78712 USA
SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
Univ Nairobi, Kenya
Univ Groningen, Netherlands
Univ Calif Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
MIT, MA 02139 USA
Univ Kentucky, KY USA
Calif State Univ Dominguez Hills, CA 90747 USA
Prague Coll Psychosocial Studies, Czech Republic
Copenhagen Business Sch, Denmark
Univ Utah, UT USA
Univ Pittsburgh, PA USA
Univ Glasgow, Scotland
Texas A&M Univ, TX USA
IIT, IL 60616 USA
Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Turkey
Imperial Coll London, England
Northwestern Univ, IL USA
Edinburgh Napier Univ, Scotland
Univ Navarra, Spain
Univ Michigan, MI 48109 USA
Yale Univ, CT USA
Univ Oberta Catalunya, Spain
Michigan State Univ, MI 48824 USA
Univ Toronto, Canada
Univ Nove Julho, Brazil
Lucerne Univ Appl Sci & Arts, Switzerland
Univ Lancaster, England
Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Brazil
Indiana Univ, IN USA
Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Switzerland
Pacific Lutheran Univ, WA 98447 USA
Rutgers State Univ, NJ USA
Leibniz Inst Educ Trajectories, Germany; Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Austria
Okayama Univ, Japan
Univ Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
Univ Bath, England; Univ Essex, England
Univ Chicago, IL USA
Xiamen Univ, Peoples R China
Elmhurst Coll, NY USA
Columbia Univ, NY USA
Univ Washington, WA 98195 USA; Indiana Univ, IN USA
Univ Oxford, England; Coventry Univ, England
Harvard Univ, MA 02138 USA
Univ Vienna, Austria
UCL, England
York Univ, Canada
Univ Utrecht, Netherlands; Katholieke Univ Leuven, Belgium
Univ Ljubljana, Slovenia
Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore
Univ Colorado, CO 80907 USA
Queen Mary Univ London, England
Univ Copenhagen, Denmark
Singapore Management Univ, Singapore
McD Tech Labs, CA USA
Univ Nottingham, England
Novo Nordisk, Denmark
Univ Idaho, ID 83843 USA
Univ St Thomas, MN USA
Heidelberg Univ, Germany
Univ Edinburgh, Scotland
Eli Lilly, IN USA
Univ Nis, Serbia
George Washington Univ, DC USA
Karolinska Inst, Sweden; Stockholm Univ, Sweden
Univ Oxford, England
Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, MD 21228 USA
Univ Western Australia, Australia
Open Univ Cyprus, Cyprus
Natl Res Univ, Russia
Univ Calif Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
McGill Univ, Canada
NIMH, MD 20892 USA
Univ Sheffield, England
Charles Univ Prague, Czech Republic; Univ Presov, Slovakia
Univ Tennessee, TN USA
Univ Bern, Switzerland; Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Germany
Washington Univ, MO 63110 USA
Dalhousie Univ, Canada
Univ Illinois, IL USA
Colorado State Univ, CO 80523 USA
CSU, CA USA
Rasa Technol, CA USA
Oberlin Coll, OH 44074 USA
Stanford Univ, CA 94305 USA
Univ Granada, Spain
Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Netherlands
Univ Hawaii, HI 96822 USA
Microsoft, WA USA; Rice Univ, TX USA
Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands
Coll Charleston, SC 29401 USA
Univ Calif Los Angeles, CA USA
Univ Texas Dallas, TX 75083 USA
KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sweden; SciLifeLab, Sweden
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
Dartmouth Coll, NH 03755 USA
نبذة مختصرة : In this crowdsourced initiative, independent analysts used the same dataset to test two hypotheses regarding the effects of scientists gender and professional status on verbosity during group meetings. Not only the analytic approach but also the operationalizations of key variables were left unconstrained and up to individual analysts. For instance, analysts could choose to operationalize status as job title, institutional ranking, citation counts, or some combination. To maximize transparency regarding the process by which analytic choices are made, the analysts used a platform we developed called DataExplained to justify both preferred and rejected analytic paths in real time. Analyses lacking sufficient detail, reproducible code, or with statistical errors were excluded, resulting in 29 analyses in the final sample. Researchers reported radically different analyses and dispersed empirical outcomes, in a number of cases obtaining significant effects in opposite directions for the same research question. A Boba multiverse analysis demonstrates that decisions about how to operationalize variables explain variability in outcomes above and beyond statistical choices (e.g., covariates). Subjective researcher decisions play a critical role in driving the reported empirical results, underscoring the need for open data, systematic robustness checks, and transparency regarding both analytic paths taken and not taken. Implications for orga-nizations and leaders, whose decision making relies in part on scientific findings, consulting reports, and internal analyses by data scientists, are discussed. ; Funding Agencies|INSEAD; Swiss National Science FoundationSwiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)European Commission [143411]
Processing Request
No Comments.