Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Spinalinio hiperbarinio bupivakaino minimali veiksminga dozė darant anorektalines operacijas (dvigubai aklas atsitiktinių imčių tyrimas) ; Minimal effective dose of spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine for adult anorectal surgery: a double-blind, randomized study

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • الموضوع:
      2005
    • Collection:
      LAEI VL (Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics Virtual Library) / LAEI VB (Lietuvos agrarinės ekonomikos institutasvirtualią biblioteką)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      The aim of the study was to find minimal effective dose of spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine for adult anorectal surgery. Methods. The study included 93 adult consecutive patients admitted for anorectal operations. Dural puncture was made before surgery in the sitting position at L3-L4 or L4-L5 with 25–26G Tamanho spinal needle (BBraun, Germany) and different volumes of hyperbaric bupivacaine (Marcaine Spinal Heavy 0.5%, AstraZeneca) were injected over 2 minutes: group 1 (n=17) 1.5 ml, group 2 (n=38) 1.0 ml, group 3 (n=38) 0.8 ml. After sitting for 10 minutes patients were asked to lie down and surgery was started. Following variables were assessed: rate of success, level and duration of sensory and motor block, time to voiding and ambulation, complications, consumption of analgesics, quality of anesthesia according to the patient and medical staff. Results. Groups were comparable in demographics. No case of failure was registered but 4 patients (10.5%) in the group 3 received supplemental i/v fentanyl to treat tension in the abdomen intraoperatively. Level of sensory block in groups 1, 2, 3 was 10.4±1.7, 7.013±2.2, 6.7±1.9 dermatomes, respectively (p<0.0001 ANOVA; p<0.0001 group 1 vs 2, group 1 vs 3, p=1.0 group 2 vs 3, Bonferroni). Extent of motor block was 2–3 scores according to the Bromage scale in 70.5% of group 1 cases, compared to 0–1 score in 97.3% of group 2 and 92.1% of group 3 cases. Median (range) duration of motor block in groups 1, 2, 3 was 90 (0–120), 0 (0–90), and 0 (0–60) min, respectively (p<0.0001 ANOVA; p<0.0001 group 1 vs 2, group 1 vs 3, p=0.13 group 2 vs 3, Bonferroni). Time of ambulation was 181.5±41.5, 136.6±32.2 and 123.0±45.9 min, respectively (p<0.0001 ANOVA; p<0.001 group 1 vs 2, p<0.00001 group 1 vs 3, p=0.43 group 2 vs 3, Bonferroni). There was no significant intergroup difference in time to urinate; retention developed in 20.4% of total cases [.].
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      http://lsmu.oai.elaba.lt/documents/6203755.pdf; http://lsmu.lvb.lt/LSMU:ELABAPDB6203755&prefLang=en_US
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      http://lsmu.oai.elaba.lt/documents/6203755.pdf
      http://lsmu.lvb.lt/LSMU:ELABAPDB6203755&prefLang=en_US
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.BF1DF2