Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Mechanisms of Overyielding and Coexistence in Diverse Tallgrass Prairie Communities

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      DigitalCommons@USU
    • الموضوع:
      2021
    • Collection:
      Utah State University: DigitalCommons@USU
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Plants compete for the same basic nutrient and water resources. According to the competitive exclusion principle, when a substantial overlap in resource pools exists, the best competitor for resources should drive all other species to extinction. The ability for plants to coexist in violation of the competitive exclusion principle is the “biodiversity paradox”. Coexistence is actually beneficial for plants: as species diversity increases, you typically see increases in plant biomass production (known as the biodiversity-productivity relationship). The mechanisms behind coexistence and the biodiversity-productivity relationship remain an ecological mystery. One hypothesis is that plants obtain water and nutrients from different places in the soil, which reduces competition and results in plants coexisting and thriving by exploiting more spaces in the soil. Another hypothesis is that plants alter the soil in which they grow to their own detriment by accumulating species-specific soil pathogens or reducing soil nutrient levels. These plant-altered soils reduce the growth of species that are becoming too dominant in a plant community, creating a plant-soil feedback (PSF) effect that maintains biodiversity and increases productivity. I explored the role of PSFs and niche partitioning in coexistence and the biodiversity-productivity relationship. I investigated 1) how PSFs affect the biodiversity-productivity relationship in controlled greenhouse experiments, 2) whether greenhouse experiments are the best method to measure the role of PSFs in biodiverse communities in the field, 3) how PSFs affect the biodiversity-productivity relationship in diverse plant communities in the field, and 4) how partitioning of soil nitrogen and soil water affect coexistence and plant productivity. Greenhouse experimentation suggested PSFs influence productivity and the biodiversity-productivity relationship, but PSFs when measured in the greenhouse were not correlated with PSFs that were measured in the field. This implies PSFs should ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/8018; https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/context/etd/article/9160/viewcontent/WILDetd2021May_Forero_Leslie.pdf
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.26076/585d-fcfc
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/8018
      https://doi.org/10.26076/585d-fcfc
      https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/context/etd/article/9160/viewcontent/WILDetd2021May_Forero_Leslie.pdf
    • Rights:
      Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact digitalcommons@usu.edu.
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.BEE73A9B