Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Moving beyond Aim Three: a need for a transdisciplinary approach to build capacity for economic evaluations in implementation science.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      eScholarship, University of California
    • الموضوع:
      2021
    • Collection:
      University of California: eScholarship
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      BackgroundUnderstanding the costs and economic benefits of implementation has been identified by policymakers and researchers as critical to increase the uptake and sustainment of evidence-based practices, but this topic remains relatively understudied. Conducting team science with health economists has been proposed as a solution to increase economic evaluation in implementation science; however, these recommendations ignore the differences in goals and perspectives in these two fields. Our recent qualitative research identified that implementation researchers predominantly approach health economists to examine costs, whereas the majority of health economists expressed limited interest in conducting economic evaluations and a desire to be more integrated within implementation science initiatives. These interviews pointed to challenges in establishing fruitful partnerships when health economists are relegated to the "Third Aim" (i.e., lowest-priority research objective) in implementation science projects by their research partners.DiscussionIn this debate paper, we argue that implementation researchers and health economists need to focus on team science research principles to expand capacity to address pressing research questions that cut across the two fields. Specifically, we use the four-phase model of transdisciplinary research to outline the goals and processes needed to build capacity in this area (Hall et al., Transl Behav Med 2:415-30, 2012). The first phase focuses on the development of transdisciplinary research teams, including identifying appropriate partners (e.g., considering policy or public health researchers in addition to health economists) and building trust. The conceptual phase focuses on strategies to consider when developing joint research questions and methodology across fields. In the implementation phase, we outline the effective processes for conducting research projects, such as team learning. Finally, in the translation phase, we highlight how a transdisciplinary approach between ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      qt6v97926h; https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6v97926h; https://escholarship.org/content/qt6v97926h/qt6v97926h.pdf
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s43058-021-00239-1
    • Rights:
      public
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.BE211531