Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Differences between risk situations identified using a self-reported questionnaire and an observational method

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
اقرأ أكثر حفظ في قائمتي
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Edition, Littératures, Langages, Informatique, Arts, Didactique, Discours - UFC (UR 4661) (ELLIADD); Université de Franche-Comté (UFC); Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté COMUE (UBFC)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté COMUE (UBFC); Épidémiologie en Santé au Travail et Ergonomie (IRSET-ESTER); Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail (Irset); Université d'Angers (UA)-Université de Rennes (UR)-École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique EHESP (EHESP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Structure Fédérative de Recherche en Biologie et Santé de Rennes ( Biosit : Biologie - Santé - Innovation Technologique )-Université d'Angers (UA)-Université de Rennes (UR)-École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique EHESP (EHESP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Structure Fédérative de Recherche en Biologie et Santé de Rennes ( Biosit : Biologie - Santé - Innovation Technologique ); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (CHU Angers); PRES Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (UNAM)
    • بيانات النشر:
      HAL CCSD
      IOS Press
    • الموضوع:
      2021
    • Collection:
      Université de Rennes 1: Publications scientifiques (HAL)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      International audience ; Background:This study investigates work-related musculoskeletal disorders risk estimation by frequently as used as ergonomic methods in the field. Objective:To identify the difference in risk estimation by an in-house observational method and a self-reported questionnaire, and to evaluate the complementary aspects of these methods. Methods:A sample of 15 operators who worked on the assembly workstations was selected from a truck manufacturing plant. The risk assessment of these workstations (28 scenarios) was performed by the observational method and the self-reported questionnaire. The agreement between both methods to identify risk situations was measured with the weighted Kappa coefficient. Results:The observational method and the self-reported questionnaire deployed on the same activity estimated different risk situations. Conclusion:This analysis does not reveal that one tool is more powerful than the other one, but shows the probability of different risk estimation. The complementary effect of each method might be considered for further investigation concerning musculoskeletal risk factors.
    • Relation:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/33612518; hal-03169687; https://hal.science/hal-03169687; https://hal.science/hal-03169687/document; https://hal.science/hal-03169687/file/Differences%20between%20Risk%20Situations%20Identified%20Using%20a%20Self-Reported%20vf.pdf; PUBMED: 33612518
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.3233/WOR-203409
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.B9EB2470