Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Liberdade e autoridade – por uma conciliação

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Peres, D. T.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4742017058571120; Pereira, Leonardo Jorge da Hora; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4012823592823597; Francisquini, Renato; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5431372913641696; Nagamine, R. R. V. K.; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5808712334043224
    • بيانات النشر:
      Universidade Federal da Bahia
      Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia (PPGF)
      UFBA
      Brasil
      Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas (FFCH)
    • الموضوع:
      2024
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      It´s perceived that both propaedeutic commentators of the Hannah Arendt´s books and her more conceptual critics, make such a characteristic and punctual approach between the autority and the freedom, that generally, it´s suspected, it up hiding ends any possibility of affinity of these concepts. In general lines, this dissertation is guided by the objective of clarifying the possible conciliation between the concepts of autority and freedom in Hannah Arendt´s political philosophy. Books of the 1960 decade, notably On revolution (1963) and Between past and the future (1968), and also some of his essays, in which Arendt asserts that, if on the one hand, the ancien régime distanced the freedom public from mens, recaptures, in this perspective, but doesnt limits it, on the other hand, the seventeenth century revoluctions faced difficulties in an attempt to conceive another anchor reference for a new political authority whose purpose would be to ensure the revolutionary spirit of participation. From a theoretical point of view, it is understood that, when trying to reconcile authority with republican freedom, some modern philosophers ended up denying authority and making full freedom impossible. For Hobbes, but also for Rousseau, authority is understood around the concept of sovereignty. For if for the former authority corresponded to the Sovereign properly constituted and immune to any challenge, for the second, the authority corresponded to the people themselves, who, as a result of a "General Will", ended up being defined in terms of sovereignty. In this sense, public freedom was undermined, because if Rousseau admitted a certain public participation of the people in a 1765 book, he denied it in his 1772 book. In contemporary republican theory, Norberto Bobbio is seen, which evokes a middle ground between the representation and participation of a democracy, and Philip Pettit, who, in his neorepublicanism, advocates a negative freedom whose participation is reduced to contestation in the face of arbitrary ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/39563
    • Rights:
      Acesso Aberto
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.AEA0A36E