Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Prognostic accuracy of the one-legged balance test in predicting falls: 15-years of midlife follow-up in a British birth cohort study

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      Frontiers Media SA
    • الموضوع:
      2022
    • Collection:
      University College London: UCL Discovery
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      INTRODUCTION: The one-legged balance test is a common screening tool for fall risk. Yet, there is little empirical evidence assessing its prognostic ability. The study aims were to assess the prognostic accuracy of one-legged balance performance in predicting falls and identify optimal cut-points to classify those at greater risk. METHODS: Data from up to 2,000 participants from a British birth cohort born in 1,946 were used. The times an individual could stand on one leg with their eyes open and closed were recorded (max: 30 s) at ages 53 and 60-64. Number of falls in the past year was self-reported at ages 53, 60-64 and 68; recurrent falls (0-1 vs. 2+) and any fall (0 vs. 1+) were considered binary outcomes. Four longitudinal associations between balance times and subsequent falls were investigated (age 53 → 60-64; age 53 → 68; age 60-64 → 68; age 53 & 60-64 → 68). For each temporal association, areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated and compared for a base sex-only model, a sex and balance model, a sex and fall history model and a combined model of sex, balance and fall history. The Liu method was used to identify optimal cut-points and sensitivity, specificity, and AUC at corresponding cut-points. RESULTS: Median eyes open balance time was 30 s at ages 53 and 60-64; median eyes closed balance times were 5 s and 3 s, respectively. The predictive ability of balance tests in predicting either fall outcome was poor (AUC range for sex and balance models: 0.577-0.600). Prognostic accuracy consistently improved by adding fall history to the model (range: 0.604-0.634). Optimal cut-points ranged from 27 s to 29 s for eyes open and 3 s to 5 s for eyes closed; AUC consistently indicated that using "optimal" cut-points to dichotomise balance time provided no discriminatory ability (AUC range:0.42-0.47), poor sensitivity (0.38-0.61) and poor specificity (0.23-0.56). DISCUSSION: Despite previous observational evidence showing associations between better one-legged balance performance and reduced fall risk, the ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10164175/1/fspor-04-1066913.pdf; https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10164175/
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10164175/1/fspor-04-1066913.pdf
      https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10164175/
    • Rights:
      open
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.AB4A0E86