Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Comparison of Methods for Alcohol and Drug Screening in Primary Care Clinics.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • الموضوع:
      2021
    • Collection:
      Université de Lausanne (UNIL): Serval - Serveur académique lausannois
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Guidelines recommend that adult patients receive screening for alcohol and drug use during primary care visits, but the adoption of screening in routine practice remains low. Clinics frequently struggle to choose a screening approach that is best suited to their resources, workflows, and patient populations. To evaluate how to best implement electronic health record (EHR)-integrated screening for substance use by comparing commonly used screening methods and examining their association with implementation outcomes. This article presents the outcomes of phases 3 and 4 of a 4-phase quality improvement, implementation feasibility study in which researchers worked with stakeholders at 6 primary care clinics in 2 large urban academic health care systems to define and implement their optimal screening approach. Site A was located in New York City and comprised 2 clinics, and site B was located in Boston, Massachusetts, and comprised 4 clinics. Clinics initiated screening between January 2017 and October 2018, and 93 114 patients were eligible for screening for alcohol and drug use. Data used in the analysis were collected between January 2017 and October 2019, and analysis was performed from July 13, 2018, to March 23, 2021. Clinics integrated validated screening questions and a brief counseling script into the EHR, with implementation supported by the use of clinical champions (ie, clinicians who advocate for change, motivate others, and use their expertise to facilitate the adoption of an intervention) and the training of clinic staff. Clinics varied in their screening approaches, including the type of visit targeted for screening (any visit vs annual examinations only), the mode of administration (staff-administered vs self-administered by the patient), and the extent to which they used practice facilitation and EHR usability testing. Data from the EHRs were extracted quarterly for 12 months to measure implementation outcomes. The primary outcome was screening rate for alcohol and drug use. Secondary outcomes were ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • ISSN:
      2574-3805
    • Relation:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/34014326; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2574-3805; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_C3C84A3C398F1; https://serval.unil.ch/notice/serval:BIB_C3C84A3C398F; urn:issn:2574-3805; https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_C3C84A3C398F.P001/REF.pdf; http://nbn-resolving.org/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_C3C84A3C398F1
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10721
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; CC BY 4.0 ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.A8D2E398