Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

P2P Storage Systems: Study of Different Placement Policies

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Technicolor Research Palo Alto; Technicolor; Combinatorics, Optimization and Algorithms for Telecommunications (COATI); Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée (CRISAM); Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-COMmunications, Réseaux, systèmes Embarqués et Distribués (Laboratoire I3S - COMRED); Laboratoire d'Informatique, Signaux, et Systèmes de Sophia Antipolis (I3S); Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Côte d'Azur (UniCA)-Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Côte d'Azur (UniCA)-Laboratoire d'Informatique, Signaux, et Systèmes de Sophia Antipolis (I3S); Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Côte d'Azur (UniCA)-Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Côte d'Azur (UniCA); Laboratoire d'informatique Fondamentale de Marseille (LIF); Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-École Centrale de Marseille (ECM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Instituto de Matemática e Estatística (IME); Universidade de São Paulo = University of São Paulo (USP); PACA; European Project
    • بيانات النشر:
      HAL CCSD
      Springer
    • الموضوع:
      2013
    • Collection:
      Aix-Marseille Université: HAL
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      International audience ; In a P2P storage system using erasure codes, a data block is en- coded in many redundancy fragments. These fragments are then sent to distinct peers of the network. In this work, we study the impact of different placement policies of these fragments on the performance of storage systems. Several practical factors (easier control, software reuse, latency) tend to favor data placement strategies that preserve some degree of locality. We compare three policies: two of them are local, in which the data are stored in logical neighbors, and the other one, global, in which the data are spread randomly in the whole sys- tem. We focus on the study of the probability to lose a data block and the bandwidth consumption to maintain such redundancy. We use simulations to show that, without resource constraints, the aver- age values are the same no matter which placement policy is used. However, the variations in the use of bandwidth are much more bursty under the local policies. When the bandwidth is limited, these bursty variations induce longer maintenance time and henceforth a higher risk of data loss. We then show that a suitable degree of locality could be introduced in order to combine the efficiency of the global policy with the practical advantages of a local placement. Additionally, we pro- pose a new external reconstruction strategy that greatly improves the performance of local placement strategies. Finally, we give analytical methods to estimate the mean time to the occurrence of data loss for the three policies.
    • Relation:
      hal-00880902; https://inria.hal.science/hal-00880902; https://inria.hal.science/hal-00880902/document; https://inria.hal.science/hal-00880902/file/placement-journal.pdf
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1007/s12083-013-0203-9
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.A8309EF0