Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

A (i)legitimidade do ativismo judicial praticado pelo STF: uma reflexão à luz dos ditames de um Estado democrático de direito ; The (il)legitimacy of judicial activism done by the supreme court: a reflection according to the dictates of a democratic state

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Espindola, Angela Araujo da Silveira
    • بيانات النشر:
      Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
      Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
    • الموضوع:
      2013
    • Collection:
      Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Trabalho de conclusão de curso (graduação) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Curso de Direito, RS, 2013. ; Nowadays, the role evidenced by the judiciary is notorious, especially by the Supreme Court on the legal/social/political national scenario. This trend is due to the creation of a generalized imaginary in the sense that the effectiveness of the rights listed in the Constitution are made dependent on judicial answers, what causes the judicialization of politics. However, the biggest problem lies not in the role itself, given the political issues become judicialized, but in how the judicialized or not issues are decided. From this perspective, the scenario of judicial activism made appear the character of the "creative" judge that failing to find the desired response in the legislative framework, he decides according to his own conscience, even in dissonance with the integrity of the law. Therefore, becomes crucial to elucidate the legitimacy of the practice of judicial activism, which has discretionary contours which lead to arbitrariness. Everything being analyzed from a reflection according to the dictates of a democratic state. To this end, preliminary, possible semantic and factual connections between judicial activism and legalization of politics are removed. Further, the hermeneutical exercise uncompromising with the integrity of Law are explored, where solipsistic interpreters "cheat" the interpretive task and invoke several principles on the judicial speeches, without normativity. In another context, we analyze concrete cases tried by the Supreme Court. Finally, the need of creating a "decision theory" is instigated, with the purpose of breaking with the solipsistic discourse, in order to maintain the consistency and integrity of law, which are fundamental in a state that calls itself democratic. ; Atualmente é notório o protagonismo evidenciado pelo Poder Judiciário, especialmente pelo STF, no cenário jurídico/político/social nacional. Essa tendência é ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/2947
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/2947
    • Rights:
      Acesso Aberto
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.A2C86E85