Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Contrasting effects of bioturbation studied in intact and reconstructed estuarine sediments

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Bartoli, M.; Benelli, S.; Magri, M.; Ribaudo, C.; Moraes, P. C.; Castaldelli, G.
    • الموضوع:
      2020
    • Collection:
      Università degli Studi di Ferrara: CINECA IRIS
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Macrofauna can produce contrasting biogeochemical effects in intact and reconstructed sediments. We measured benthic fluxes of oxygen, inorganic carbon, and nitrogen and denitrification rates in intact sediments dominated by a filter and a deposit feeder and in reconstructed sediments added with increasing densities of the same organisms. Measurements in reconstructed sediments were carried out 5 days after macrofauna addition. The degree of stimulation of the measured fluxes in the intact and reconstructed sediments was then compared. Results confirmed that high densities of bioturbating macrofauna produce profound effects on sediment biogeochemistry, enhancing benthic respiration and ammonium recycling by up to a factor of ~3 and ~9, respectively, as compared to control sediments. The deposit feeder also increased total denitrification by a factor of ~2, whereas the filter feeder activity did not stimulate nitrogen removal. Moreover, the effects of deposit feeders on benthic fluxes were significantly higher (e.g., on respiration and ammonium recycling) or different (e.g., on denitrification) when measured in intact and reconstructed sediments. In intact sediments, deposit feeders enhanced the denitrification coupled to nitrification and had no effects on the denitrification of water column nitrate, whereas in reconstructed sediments, the opposite was true. This may reflect active burrowing in reconstructed sediments and the long time needed for slow growing nitrifiers to develop within burrows. Results suggest that, in bioturbation studies, oversimplified experimental approaches and insufficient preincubation time might lead to wrong interpretation of the role of macrofauna in sediment biogeochemistry, far from that occurring in nature.
    • File Description:
      ELETTRONICO
    • Relation:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000594327200001; volume:12; issue:11; firstpage:3125-1; lastpage:3125-14; numberofpages:14; journal:WATER; http://hdl.handle.net/11392/2438700; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85095969469; https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/11/3125/pdf?version=1606218609; https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/11/3125
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.3390/w12113125
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      http://hdl.handle.net/11392/2438700
      https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113125
      https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/11/3125/pdf?version=1606218609
      https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/11/3125
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.A1C71383