Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Clinical experience with ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of infections due to multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria other than carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Vena, A.; Giacobbe, D. R.; Castaldo, N.; Cattelan, A.; Mussini, C.; Luzzati, R.; De Rosa, F. G.; Del Puente, F.; Mastroianni, C. M.; Cascio, A.; Carbonara, S.; Capone, A.; Boni, S.; Sepulcri, C.; Meschiari, M.; Raumer, F.; Oliva, A.; Corcione, S.; Bassetti, M.; Ceftabuse Study, Group
    • بيانات النشر:
      MDPI AG
    • الموضوع:
      2020
    • Collection:
      Sapienza Università di Roma: CINECA IRIS
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Experience in real clinical practice with ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of serious infections due to gram−negative bacteria (GNB) other than carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is very limited. Methods: We carried out a retrospective multicenter study of patients hospitalized in 13 Italian hospitals who received ≤72 h of ceftazidime-avibactam for GNB other than CRE to assess the rates of clinical success, resistance development, and occurrence of adverse events. Results: Ceftazidime-avibactam was used to treat 41 patients with GNB infections other than CRE. Median age was 62 years and 68% of them were male. The main causative agents were P. aeruginosa (33/41; 80.5%) and extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales (4/41, 9.8%). Four patients had polymicrobial infections. All strains were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. The most common primary infection was nosocomial pneumonia (n = 20; 48.8%), primary bacteremia (n = 7; 17.1%), intra-abdominal infection (n = 4; 9.8%), and bone infection (n = 4; 9.8%). Ceftazidime-avibactam was mainly administered as a combination treatment (n = 33; 80.5%) and the median length of therapy was 13 days. Clinical success at the end of the follow-up period was 90.5%, and the only risk factor for treatment failure at multivariate analysis was receiving continuous renal replacement therapy during ceftazidime-avibactam. There was no association between clinical failures and type of primary infection, microbiological isolates, and monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam. Only one patient experienced recurrent infection 5 days after the end of treatment. Development of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam was not detected in any case during the whole follow-up period. No adverse events related to ceftazidime-avibactam were observed in the study population. Conclusions: Ceftazidime-avibactam may be a valuable therapeutic option for serious infections due to GNB other than CRE.
    • Relation:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/32050434; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000519242200054; volume:9; issue:2; firstpage:1; lastpage:15; numberofpages:15; journal:ANTIBIOTICS; http://hdl.handle.net/11573/1381335; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85079845626
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.3390/antibiotics9020071
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.95D5843F