نبذة مختصرة : The aim of this investigation is to assess if the use of Natural Laminar Flow (NLF) aerofoils alone improves the efficiency of a wing in comparison to their NACA equivalents. To compare performance, the lift-to-drag ratio (Efficiency) of the wings has been considered. A cruise speed range from M0.1 to M0.3 was analysed for the low-speed wing, while a Mach sweep between M0.3 and M0.85 was assessed for the high-speed wing. A final analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of the presence of a sweepback angle in the wing, from straight leading edge to a 10-degree-sweepback wing. For the low-speed wing, it was observed that the efficiency of the laminar wing is slightly decreasing with speed (up to 17% between M0.1 and M0.3) but is increasingly higher than in the NACA wing (from 5% at M0.1 to 16% at M0.3). This means that the aim of the laminar aerofoil is met, so that for a cruise speed between 100 and 300km/h lower drag is produced and therefore lower thrust (and fuel consumption) is required. In the case of the high-speed application, it was found that the laminar flow wing had lower efficiencies when compared to its NACA equivalent. Analysing the results, it was noted that the ratio of the lateral forces to lift had a direct relation to the efficiency: when this ratio was increased, the efficiency was decreased, and vice-versa. It was observed that, in the case of laminar wings, not applying a sweepback to the leading edge (LE) is optimal and duplicates the efficiency with respect to adding any angle. Moreover, this is the only case observed where the efficiency of the laminar wing is higher than its NACA equivalent. ; Sin financiación ; No data (2019) ; UEM
No Comments.